The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks
Open accessAbstract
Sniffing, a rhythmic inhalation and exhalation of air through the nose, is a behavior thought to play a critical role in shaping how odor information is represented and processed by the nervous system. Although the mouse has become a prominent model for studying olfaction, little is known about sniffing behavior in mice. Here, we characterized mouse sniffing behavior by measuring intranasal pressure transients in behaving mice. Sniffing was monitored during unstructured exploratory behavior and during performance of 3 commonly used olfactory paradigms: a habituation/dishabituation task, a sand digging-based discrimination task, and a nose poke-based discrimination task. We found that respiration frequencies in quiescent mice ranged from 3 to 5 Hz--higher than that reported for rats. During exploration, sniff frequency increased up to approximately 12 Hz and was highly dynamic, with rapid changes in frequency, amplitude, and waveform. Sniffing behavior varied strongly between tasks as well as for different behavioral epochs of each task. For example, mice performing the digging-based task showed little increase in sniff frequency prior to digging, whereas mice performing a nose poke-based task showed robust increases. Mice showed large increases in sniff frequency prior to reward delivery in all tasks. Mice also showed increases in sniff frequency when nose poking in a nonodor-guided task. These results show that mouse sniffing behavior is highly dynamic, varies with behavioral context, and is strongly modulated by olfactory as well as nonolfactory events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Perceptual Attentional Set Shifting in the Rat
Birrell, J. M., & Brown, V. J. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-11-04320.2000 · Cited by 1,421
Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events
Fortin, N. J., Agster, K. L., & Eichenbaum, H. B. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn834 · Cited by 881
Lesions of the dorsal noradrenergic bundle impair attentional set-shifting in the rat
Tait, D. S., Brown, V. J., Farovik, A., Theobald, D. E., Dalley, J. W., & Robbins, T. W. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05612.x · Cited by 179
Cited by
Simple Behavioral Assessment of Mouse Olfaction
Yang, M., & Crawley, J. N. (2009) · Current Protocols in Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0824s48 · Cited by 564
Respiration-Entrained Brain Rhythms Are Global but Often Overlooked
Tort, A. B. L., Brankačk, J., & Draguhn, A. (2018) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.007 · Cited by 335
All in a Sniff: Olfaction as a Model for Active Sensing
Wachowiak, M. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.030 · Cited by 353
Self-citationThe fluid dynamics of canine olfaction: unique nasal airflow patterns as an explanation of macrosmia
Craven, B. A., Paterson, E. G., & Settles, G. S. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0490 · Cited by 301
Robust Odor Coding via Inhalation-Coupled Transient Activity in the Mammalian Olfactory Bulb
Cury, K. M., & Uchida, N. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.040 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesson, D. W., Donahou, T. N., Johnson, M. O., & Wachowiak, M.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 581-596
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2167371136
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/bjn029
- The paper
- Wesson, D. W., Donahou, T. N., Johnson, M. O., & Wachowiak, M. (2008). Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.