Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Serologic Testing (September 2020)

Open access
Hanson, Kimberly E, Caliendo, Angela M, Arias, Cesar A, Englund, Janet A, Hayden, Mary K, Lee, Mark J, Loeb, Mark, Patel, Robin, Altayar, Osama, El Alayli, Abdallah, Sultan, Shahnaz, Falck-Ytter, Yngve, Lavergne, Valéry, Morgan, Rebecca L, Murad, M Hassan, Bhimraj, Adarsh, Mustafa, Reem A·2024·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: The availability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic testing has rapidly increased. Current assays use a variety of technologies, measure different classes of immunoglobulin or immunoglobulin combinations, and detect antibodies directed against different portions of the virus. The overall accuracy of these tests, however, has not been well defined. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) serology literature and construct best-practice guidance related to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing. This guideline is the fourth in a series of rapid, frequently updated COVID-19 guidelines developed by IDSA. Objective: IDSA’s goal was to develop evidence-based recommendations that assist clinicians, clinical laboratories, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests in a variety of settings. We also highlight important unmet research needs pertaining to the use of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for diagnosis, public health surveillance, vaccine development, and the selection of convalescent plasma donors. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review identified and prioritized clinical questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. Results: The panel agreed on 8 diagnostic recommendations. Conclusions: Information on the clinical performance and utility of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests is rapidly emerging. Based on available evidence, detection of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may be useful for confirming the presence of current or past infection in selected situations. The panel identified 3 potential indications for serologic testing, including (1) evaluation of patients with a high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 when molecular diagnostic testing is negative and ≥2 weeks have passed since symptom onset, (2) assessment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and (3) conducting serosurveillance studies. The certainty of available evidence supporting the use of serology for either diagnosis or epidemiology was, however, graded as very low to moderate. For the most updated version of these guidelines, please go to https://www.idsociety.org/covid19guidelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa1343

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Hanson, K. E., Caliendo, A. M., Arias, C. A., Englund, J. A., Hayden, M. K., Lee, M. J., Loeb, M., Patel, R., Altayar, O., El Alayli, A., Sultan, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Lavergne, V., Morgan, R. L., Murad, M. H., Bhimraj, A., & Mustafa, R. A.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-09-12
Volume
78
Issue
7
Pages
e150-e169
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3086365214
Cited by
179
References
17
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Serologic Testing (September 2020). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciaa1343
The paper
Hanson, K. E., Caliendo, A. M., Arias, C. A., Englund, J. A., Hayden, M. K., Lee, M. J., Loeb, M., Patel, R., Altayar, O., El Alayli, A., Sultan, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Lavergne, V., Morgan, R. L., Murad, M. H., Bhimraj, A., & Mustafa, R. A. (2024). Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Serologic Testing (September 2020). Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1343

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.