CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 149Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Review of the Evidence for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines

Open access
Nyirjesy, Paul, Brookhart, Carolyn, Lazenby, Gweneth, Schwebke, Jane, Sobel, Jack D·2022·Clinical Infectious Diseases
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciab1057
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common cause of vulvovaginal itching and discharge. This article discusses the latest CDC STI Treatment Guidelines for VVC. Methods: A literature search of relevant topics was performed, and a team of experts was convened to discuss (1) diagnosis/testing modalities; treatment of (2) uncomplicated VVC , (3) complicated VVC, and (4) VVC caused by non-albicans yeast; (5) alternative treatment regimens; (6) susceptibility testing of yeast; Special Populations: (7) pregnancy and (8) HIV and VVC. Results: Yeast culture remains the gold standard for diagnoses. Newer molecular assays have been developed for the diagnosis of VVC and perform well. Azole antifungals remain the treatment of choice for uncomplicated VVC. Two new drugs, TOL-463 and recently FDA-approved ibrexafungerp, appeared promising in clinical trials. For recurrent VVC, oteseconazole, not yet commercially available, may represent a new option. For non-albicans yeast infections in symptomatic patients, boric acid appears useful. No evidence supports the use of alternative treatments, including probiotics. Fluconazole during pregnancy may be associated with spontaneous abortion and craniofacial and heart defects. In women with HIV infection, lower CD4+ T-cell counts are associated with increased rates of VVC, and VVC is associated with increased viral shedding. Treatment measures in women with HIV infection are identical to those women without HIV infection. Conclusions: There has been significant new knowledge generated about VVC since the 2015 CDC Guidelines which have led to changing recommendations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciab1057

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Buggio, 2019, Probiotcs and vaginal microbiology: fact or fancy?, BMC Women\'s Health, 25, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nyirjesy, P., Brookhart, C., Lazenby, G., Schwebke, J., & Sobel, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nyirjesy, Paul
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2022-04-13
Volume
74
Issue
Supplement_2
Pages
S162-S168
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
DOI
10.1093/cid/ciab1057
OpenAlex
W4205266914
Semantic Scholar
a386599dfec08ff933ebc36fc684a0da8e45a4e3
Cited by
149
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 24
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
vaginal candidiasis, molecular diagnosis, azole antifungals, ibrexafungerp, oteseconazole, boric acid, recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, pregnancy, HIV infection, fluconazole, CD4 count, probiotics
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, United States, HIV Infections, Fluconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review