Cited by 144Reproductive tract infections researchBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis

Open access
Gaydos, Charlotte A., Beqaj, Sajo, Schwebke, Jane R., Lebed, Joel, Smith, Bonnie, Davis, Thomas E., Fife, Kenneth H., Nyirjesy, Paul +5 more·2017·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture. RESULTS: For clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs. CONCLUSION: A molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000002090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [2]Koumans EH Sternberg M Bruce C McQuillan G Kendrick J Sutton M The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health Sex Transm Dis 2007 34 864 9 17621244
  2. [3]Anderson MR Klink K Cohrssen A Evaluation of vaginal complaints JAMA 2004 291 1368 79 15026404
  3. [4]Taylor BD Darville T Haggerty CL Does bacterial vaginosis cause pelvic inflammatory disease? Sex Transm Dis 2013 40 117 22 23324974
  4. [5]O’Hanlon DE Moench TR Cone RA Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota PLoS One 2013 8 e80074 24223212 PMC3819307
  5. [6]Ravel J Gajer P Abdo Z Schneider GM Koenig SS McCulle SL Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 108 suppl 1 4680 7 20534435 PMC3063603
  6. [7]Amsel R Totten PA Spiegel CA Chen KC Eschenbach D Holmes KK Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations Am J Med 1983 74 14 22 6600371
  7. [8]Menard JP Fenollar F Henry M Bretelle F Raoult D Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis Clin Infect Dis 2008 47 33 43 18513147
  8. [9]Fredricks DN Fiedler TL Thomas KK Oakley BB Marrazzo JM Targeted PCR for detection of vaginal bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis J Clin Microbiol 2007 45 3270 6 17687006 PMC2045326
  9. [10]Kennedy MA Sobel JD Vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by non-albicans Candida species: new insights Curr Infect Dis Rep 2010 12 465 70 21308556
  10. [11]Mahmoudi Rad M Zafarghandi A Amel Zabihi M Tavallaee M Mirdamadi Y Identification of candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis by multiplex PCR Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012 2012 872169 22791958 PMC3389677
  11. [12]Richter SS Galask RP Messer SA Hollis RJ Diekema DJ Pfaller MA Antifungal susceptibilities of candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases J Clin Microbiol 2005 43 2155 62 15872235 PMC1153777
  12. [13]Workowski KA Bolan GA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015 MMWR Recomm Rep 2015 64 1 137 PMC5885289 26042815
  13. [14]Nugent RP Krohn MA Hillier SL Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation J Clin Microbiol 1991 29 297 301 1706728 PMC269757
  14. [15]Brotman RM Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective J Clin Invest 2011 121 4610 7 22133886 PMC3225992
  15. [16]Schaaf VM Perez-Stable EJ Borchardt K The limited value of symptoms and signs in the diagnosis of vaginal infections Arch Intern Med 1990 150 1929 33 2393324
  16. [17]Berg AO Heidrich FE Fihn SD Bergman JJ Wood RW Stamm WE Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice JAMA 1984 251 620 5 6690835
  17. [18]Shipitsyna E Roos A Datcu R Hallen A Fredlund H Jensen JS Composition of the vaginal microbiota in women of reproductive age—sensitive and specific molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis is possible? PLoS One 2013 8 e60670 23585843 PMC3621988
  18. [20]Fouts AC Kraus SJ Trichomonas vaginalis: reevaluation of its clinical presentation and laboratory diagnosis J Infect Dis 1980 141 137 143 6965976
  19. [22]Gaydos CA Hobbs M Marrazzo J Schwebke J Coleman JS Masek B Rapid diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis by testing vaginal swabs in an isothermal helicase-dependent Am-pliVue assay Sex Transm Dis 2016 43 369 73 27196258 PMC4874652
  20. [23]Schwebke JR Hobbs MM Taylor SN Sena AC Catania MG Weinbaum BS Molecular testing for Trichomonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective U.S. clinical trial J Clin Microbiol 2011 49 4106 11 21940475 PMC3232944
  21. [25]Srinivasan S Hoffman NG Morgan MT Matsen FA Fiedler TL Hall RW Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria PLoS One 2012 7 e37818 22719852 PMC3377712
  22. [26]Liguori G Di Onofrio V Gallé F Lucariello A Albano L Catania MR Candida albicans identification: comparison among nine phenotypic systems and a multiplex PCR J Prev Med Hyg 2010 51 121 4 21361117
  23. [27]Schwebke JR Hillier SL Sobel JD McGregor JA Sweet RL Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis Obstet Gynecol 1996 88 573 6 8841221

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaydos, C. A., Beqaj, S., Schwebke, J. R., Lebed, J., Smith, B., Davis, T. E., Fife, K. H., Nyirjesy, P., Spurrell, T., Furgerson, D., Coleman, J., Paradis, S., & Cooper, C. K.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2017-07
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
181-189
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622942920
Cited by
144
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI068613)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U54EB007958)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
vaginal infection, bacterial vaginosis, vaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, vaginal microbiota, molecular diagnostic tests, self-collected vaginal swabs, sensitivity and specificity, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Nugent score, Amsel criteria, co-infection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Candida, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Humans, Lactobacillus, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Trichomonas Infections, Trichomonas vaginalis, United States, Vaginal Smears, Vaginitis, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review