Cited by 125Infection Control and VentilationSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchDental Research and COVID-19

Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Exhaled Aerosols and Efficacy of Masks During Early Mild Infection

Open access
Adenaiye, Oluwasanmi O, Lai, Jianyu, Bueno de Mesquita, P Jacob, Hong, Filbert, Youssefi, Somayeh, German, Jennifer, Tai, S H Sheldon, Albert, Barbara +13 more·2022·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemiology implicates airborne transmission; aerosol infectiousness and impacts of masks and variants on aerosol shedding are not well understood. Methods: We recruited coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to give blood, saliva, mid-turbinate and fomite (phone) swabs, and 30-minute breath samples while vocalizing into a Gesundheit-II, with and without masks at up to 2 visits 2 days apart. We quantified and sequenced viral RNA, cultured virus, and assayed serum samples for anti-spike and anti-receptor binding domain antibodies. Results: We enrolled 49 seronegative cases (mean days post onset 3.8 ± 2.1), May 2020 through April 2021. We detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 36% of fine (≤5 µm), 26% of coarse (>5 µm) aerosols, and 52% of fomite samples overall and in all samples from 4 alpha variant cases. Masks reduced viral RNA by 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 72%) in fine and by 77% (95% CI, 51 to 89%) in coarse aerosols; cloth and surgical masks were not significantly different. The alpha variant was associated with a 43-fold (95% CI, 6.6- to 280-fold) increase in fine aerosol viral RNA, compared with earlier viruses, that remained a significant 18-fold (95% CI, 3.4- to 92-fold) increase adjusting for viral RNA in saliva, swabs, and other potential confounders. Two fine aerosol samples, collected while participants wore masks, were culture-positive. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 is evolving toward more efficient aerosol generation and loose-fitting masks provide significant but only modest source control. Therefore, until vaccination rates are very high, continued layered controls and tight-fitting masks and respirators will be necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciab797

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through inhalation of virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.

    “Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through the inhalation of a virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adenaiye, O. O., Lai, J., Bueno de Mesquita, P. J., Hong, F., Youssefi, S., German, J., Tai, S. H. S., Albert, B., Schanz, M., Weston, S., Hang, J., Fung, C., Chung, H. K., Coleman, K. K., Sapoval, N., Treangen, T., Berry, I. M., Mullins, K., Frieman, M., Ma, T., & Milton, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Public Health Aerobiology and Biomarker Laboratory, Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health , College Park, Maryland , USA
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
Milton, Donald K
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2021-09-14
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
e241-e248
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3199915974
Cited by
125
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 11
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rice Research Repository (Rice University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (HHSN272201400008C)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, airborne transmission, exhaled aerosols, face masks, Alpha variant, fine aerosols, viral RNA quantification, source control, viral culture, anti-spike antibodies, respiratory droplets, fomite transmission
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets, Humans, Masks, RNA, Viral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review