Cited by 39Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Preventing New Gram-negative Resistance Through Beta-lactam De-escalation in Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Open access
Teshome, Besu F, Park, Taehwan, Arackal, Joel, Hampton, Nicholas, Kollef, Marin H, Micek, Scott T·2024·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed. Findings: Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16–1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48–.73]). Conclusions: De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciae253

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fast de-escalation was shown to be associated with a decreased risk.

    “and a fast de-escalation was shown to be associated with a decreased risk [26, 27].”

    From Lab efficiency and improvements in the management of bloodstream infections: a before and after study (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Outcomes section reports that beta-lactam de-escalation was associated with less new gram-negative resistance than no change (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48–0.73). But the Discussion says patients were classified using their entire beta-lactam exposure, not just the early treatment phase; the paper therefore does not establish the added claim about *fast* de-escalation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Antibiotic resistance is correlated with antibiotic use.

    “Antibiotic resistance being correlated with antibiotic use, in terms of antimicrobial stewardship, it is crucial that antibiotics are only used when indicated”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Nelson RE, Hyun D, Jezek A, Samore MH. Mortality, length of stay, and health- care costs associated with multidrug-resistant bacterial infections among elderly hospitalized patients in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 74:1070-80.
  2. Nelson RE, Slayton RB, Stevens VW, et al. Attributable mortality of healthcare-associated infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacte- ria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38:848-56.
  3. Kollef MH. Antimicrobial therapy of ventilator-associated pneumonia: how to se- lect an appropriate drug regimen. Chest 1999; 115:8-11.
  4. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:e51-77.
  5. Tabah A, Bassetti M, Kollef MH, et al. Antimicrobial de-escalation in critically ill patients: a position statement from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Critically Ill Patients Study Group (ESGCIP). Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:245-65.
  6. Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon J-Y, et al. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic ther- apy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 290:2588-98.
  7. Uranga A, España PP, Bilbao A, et al. Duration of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1257-65.
  8. Teshome BF, Vouri SM, Hampton N, Kollef MH, Micek ST. Duration of exposure to antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics in the critically ill and development of new resistance. Pharmacotherapy 2019; 39:261-70.
  9. Yusuf E, Van Herendael B, Verbrugghe W, et al. Emergence of antimicrobial re- sistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the intensive care unit: association with the duration of antibiotic exposure and mode of administration. Ann Intensive Care 2017; 7:72.
  10. De Bus L, Denys W, Catteeuw J, et al. Impact of de-escalation of beta-lactam an- tibiotics on the emergence of antibiotic resistance in ICU patients: a retrospective observational study. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1029-39.
  11. Weiss E, Zahar JR, Garrouste-Orgeas M, et al. De-escalation of pivotal beta- lactam in ventilator-associated pneumonia does not impact outcome and margin- ally affects MDR acquisition. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:2098-100.
  12. Ilges D, Tande AJ, Stevens RW. A broad spectrum of possibilities: spectrum scores as a unifying metric of antibiotic utilization. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:167-73.
  13. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801-10.
  14. Gerber JS, Hersh AL, Kronman MP, Newland JG, Ross RK, Metjian TA. Development and application of an antibiotic spectrum index for benchmarking antibiotic selection patterns across hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38:993-7.
  15. Madaras-Kelly K, Jones M, Remington R, Caplinger C, Huttner B, Samore M. Description and validation of a spectrum score method to measure antimicrobial de-escalation in healthcare associated pneumonia from electronic medical re- cords data. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:197.
  16. Latouche A, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Labopin M, Fine JP. A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative inci- dence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:648-53.
  17. Austin PC, Fine JP. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data. Stat Med 2017; 36:4391-400.
  18. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, et al. Management of adults with hospital- acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:e61-111.
  19. Mazuski JE, Tessier JM, May AK, et al. The surgical infection society revised guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 18:1-76.
  20. Munoz-Price LS, Frencken JF, Tarima S, Bonten M. Handling time-dependent variables: antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:1558-63.
  21. Teshome BF, Vouri SM, Hampton NB, Kollef MH, Micek ST. Evaluation of a ceiling effect on the association of new resistance development to antipseudomonal beta- lactam exposure in the critically ill. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 41:484-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teshome, B. F., Park, T., Arackal, J., Hampton, N., Kollef, M. H., & Micek, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy (US)
  • St. John's University (US)
  • BJC HealthCare (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Micek, Scott T
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2024-06-06
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
826-833
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W4399392886
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 5
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
sepsis, antimicrobial resistance prevention, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Sepsis, beta-Lactams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review