Cited by 393Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments

A Multicenter Evaluation of Tests for Diagnosis of Histoplasmosis

Open access
Hage, C. A., Ribes, J. A., Wengenack, N. L., Baddour, L. M., Assi, M., McKinsey, D. S., Hammoud, K., Alapat, D. +9 more·2011·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of the MVista Histoplasma antigen enzyme immunoassay (MiraVista Diagnostics) has been evaluated in disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS and in the "epidemic" form of acute pneumonia. Moreover, there has been no evaluation of the sensitivity of antigenemia detection in disseminated histoplasmosis after the implementation of methods to dissociate immune complexes and denature released antibodies. The goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity of the current antigen assay in different categories of histoplasmosis. METHODS: Urine and serum specimens obtained from 218 patients with histoplasmosis and 229 control subjects, including 30 with blastomycosis, were tested. RESULTS: Antigenuria was detected in 91.8% of 158 patients with disseminated histoplasmosis, 83.3% of 6 patients with acute histoplasmosis, 30.4% of 46 patients with subacute histoplasmosis, and 87.5% of 8 patients with chronic pulmonary histoplasmosis; antigenemia was present in 100% of 31 tested cases of disseminated histoplasmosis. Among patients with disseminated cases, antigenuria was detected more often and at higher concentrations in immunocompromised patients and those with severe disease. Specificity was 99.0% for patients with nonfungal infections (n = 130) and in healthy subjects (n = 69), but cross-reactivity occurred in 90% of patients with blastomycosis. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of antigen detection in disseminated histoplasmosis is higher in immunocompromised patients than in immunocompetent patients and in patients with more severe illness. The sensitivity for detection of antigenemia is similar to that for antigenuria in disseminated infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cir435

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRSA accounts for approximately 5% of culture-positive infections among critically ill patients, and may be decreasing according to some reports.

    “MRSA accounts for approximately 5% of culturepositive infections among critically ill patients (133), and may be decreasing according to some reports (134, 135).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Results passages under Disseminated Histoplasmosis report culture positivity and disease severity in patients with histoplasmosis, not the proportion of culture-positive infections caused by MRSA in critically ill patients. A search for MRSA, the approximately 5% figure, and a decreasing trend found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The incidence of MRSA varies by region (ranging from ~2% in Western Europe to 10% in North America) and by patient-related characteristics.

    “The incidence of MRSA varies, however, by region (ranging from ~2% in Western Europe to 10% in North America) and by patient-related characteristics (133, 136, 137).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Results and Disseminated Histoplasmosis sections report Histoplasma antigen-test findings, including differences by patients’ immune status, not MRSA incidence. Searches for MRSA, the Western Europe–North America comparison, and the 2%–10% range found no passage addressing the claim; the cited paper therefore cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a recent large international point prevalence study, viruses were documented in less than 4% of infections.

    “In a recent large international point prevalence study, viruses were documented in less than 4% of infections (133).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Patients section describes 218 evaluable histoplasmosis cases at US centers, and the Discussion addresses the sensitivity of diagnostic tests for histoplasmosis. Searches for an international point-prevalence study and for viral infections or a figure below 4% found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Wheat LJ, Kohler RB, Tewari RP. Diagnosis of disseminated histo- plasmosis by detection of Histoplasma capsulatum antigen in serum and urine specimens. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:83-8.
  2. Durkin MM, Connolly PA, Wheat LJ. Comparison of radioimmuno- assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay methods for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum antigen. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35:2252-5.
  3. Wheat LJ, Witt J 3rd, Durkin M, Connolly P. Reduction in false antigenemia in the second generation Histoplasma antigen assay. Med Mycol 2007; 45:169-71.
  4. Connolly PA, Durkin MM, Lemonte AM, Hackett EJ, Wheat LJ. De- tection of histoplasma antigen by a quantitative enzyme immunoassay. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007; 14:1587-91.
  5. Swartzentruber S, LeMonte A, Witt J, et al. Improved detection of Histoplasma antigenemia following dissociation of immune complexes. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009; 16:320-2.
  6. Kauffman CA. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis in immunosuppressed patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2008; 21:421-5.
  7. Swartzentruber S, Rhodes L, Kurkjian K, et al. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis by antigen detection. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:1878-2.
  8. Wheat J, French ML, Kohler RB, et al. The diagnostic laboratory tests for histoplasmosis: analysis of experience in a large urban outbreak. Ann Intern Med 1982; 97:680-5.
  9. Wheat LJ, Conces D, Allen SD, Blue-Hnidy D, Loyd J. Pulmonary histoplasmosis syndromes: recognition, diagnosis, and management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 25:129-44.
  10. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than ''Exact'' for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat 1998; 52:119-26.
  11. Wheat LJ, Smith EJ, Sathapatayavongs B, et al. Histoplasmosis in renal allograft recipients. Two large urban outbreaks. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:703-7.
  12. Smith KG, Isbel NM, Catton MG, Leydon JA, Becker GJ, Walker RG. Suppression of the humoral immune response by mycophenolate mofetil. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:160-4.
  13. Winslow MM, Gallo EM, Neilson JR, Crabtree GR. The calcineurin phosphatase complex modulates immunogenic B cell responses. Im- munity 2006; 24:141-52.
  14. Davies SF, Sarosi GA. Serodiagnosis of histoplasmosis and blastomy- cosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136:254-5.
  15. Bariola JR, Hage CA, Durkin M, et al. Detection of Blastomyces dermatitidis antigen in patients with newly diagnosed blastomycosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2011; 69:187-91.
  16. Hage CA, Davis TE, Fuller D, et al. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis by antigen detection in BAL fluid. Chest 2010; 137:623-8.
  17. Bialek R, Feucht A, Aepinus C, et al. Evaluation of two nested PCR assays for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum DNA in human tissue. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:1644-7.
  18. Tang YW, Li H, Durkin MM, et al. Urine polymerase chain reaction is not as sensitive as urine antigen for the diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 54:283-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hage, C. A., Ribes, J. A., Wengenack, N. L., Baddour, L. M., Assi, M., McKinsey, D. S., Hammoud, K., Alapat, D., Babady, N. E., Parker, M., Fuller, D., Noor, A., Davis, T. E., Rodgers, M., Connolly, P. A., El Haddad, B., & Wheat, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2011-08-02
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
448-454
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2110538662
Cited by
393
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
histoplasmosis, Histoplasma antigen, enzyme immunoassay, antigenuria, antigenemia, diagnostic sensitivity, immunocompromised patients, AIDS, disseminated histoplasmosis, acute histoplasmosis, chronic pulmonary histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, cross-reactivity
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Fungal, Antigens, Fungal, Cross Reactions, Histoplasma, Histoplasmosis, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Lung Diseases, Fungal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Mycological Typing Techniques, Immunocompromised Host

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review