Cited by 23Infection Control in HealthcareAntibiotic Use and ResistanceAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

A Regional Informatics Platform for Coordinated Antibiotic-Resistant Infection Tracking, Alerting, and Prevention

Open access
Kho, Abel N., Doebbeling, Bradley N., Cashy, John P., Rosenman, Marc B., Dexter, Paul R., Shepherd, David C., Lemmon, Larry, Teal, Evgenia +2 more·2013·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed and assessed the impact of a patient registry and electronic admission notification system relating to regional antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on regional AMR infection rates over time. We conducted an observational cohort study of all patients identified as infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and/or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) on at least 1 occasion by any of 5 healthcare systems between 2003 and 2010. The 5 healthcare systems included 17 hospitals and associated clinics in the Indianapolis, Indiana, region. METHODS: We developed and standardized a registry of MRSA and VRE patients and created Web forms that infection preventionists (IPs) used to maintain the lists. We sent e-mail alerts to IPs whenever a patient previously infected or colonized with MRSA or VRE registered for admission to a study hospital from June 2007 through June 2010. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, we delivered 12 748 e-mail alerts on 6270 unique patients to 24 IPs covering 17 hospitals. One in 5 (22%-23%) of all admission alerts was based on data from a healthcare system that was different from the admitting hospital; a few hospitals accounted for most of this crossover among facilities and systems. CONCLUSIONS: Regional patient registries identify an important patient cohort with relevant prior antibiotic-resistant infection data from different healthcare institutions. Regional registries can identify trends and interinstitutional movement not otherwise apparent from single institution data. Importantly, electronic alerts can notify of the need to isolate early and to institute other measures to prevent transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cit229

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kho, A. N., Doebbeling, B. N., Cashy, J. P., Rosenman, M. B., Dexter, P. R., Shepherd, D. C., Lemmon, L., Teal, E., Khokar, S., & Overhage, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kho, Abel N.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2013-04-10
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
254-262
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2170484485
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007117)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, patient registry, electronic alerts, infection control, patient isolation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Indiana, Male, Medical Informatics Applications, Middle Aged, Registries, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Methicillin Resistance, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Enterococcus, Disease Notification, Vancomycin Resistance, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review