Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effectiveness of Clindamycin and Intravenous Immunoglobulin, and Risk of Disease in Contacts, in Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections

Open access
Carapetis, J. R., Jacoby, P., Carville, K., Ang, S.-J. J., Curtis, N., Andrews, R.·2014·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in treatment of invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) infection, and the need for prophylactic antibiotics in close contacts, remains contentious. Controlled trials are unlikely to be conducted, so prospective, observational studies provide the best data to inform practice. METHODS: We conducted population-based, prospective, active surveillance of iGAS infections throughout the state of Victoria, Australia (population 4.9 million), from March 2002 through August 2004. RESULTS: Eighty-four cases of severe iGAS infection (streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis, septic shock, or GAS cellulitis with shock) were identified. Clindamycin-treated patients had more severe disease than clindamycin-untreated patients but lower mortality (15% vs 39%; odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], .10-.80). Among those who received concurrent IVIG, the fatality rate was lower still (7%). The adjusted point estimate of the OR for mortality was lower in clindamycin-treated patients (0.31; 95% CI, .09-1.12) and clindamycin plus IVIG-treated patients (0.12; 95% CI, .01-1.29) compared with clindamycin-untreated patients. Three confirmed cases of iGAS infection occurred in household contacts of index cases. The incidence rate of iGAS disease in contacts was 2011 (95% CI, 413-5929) times higher than the population incidence in Victoria. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that clindamycin treatment of patients with severe iGAS infections substantially reduces mortality and that this effect may be enhanced by concurrent treatment with IVIG. The dramatically increased risk of iGAS disease among household contacts within 1 month of the index case highlights a potential role for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciu304

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Carapetis, J. R., Jacoby, P., Carville, K., Ang, S.-J. J., Curtis, N., & Andrews, R.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2014-04-29
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
358-365
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W1978532273
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
21.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Clindamycin and Intravenous Immunoglobulin, and Risk of Disease in Contacts, in Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciu304
The paper
Carapetis, J. R., Jacoby, P., Carville, K., Ang, S.-J. J., Curtis, N., & Andrews, R. (2014). Effectiveness of Clindamycin and Intravenous Immunoglobulin, and Risk of Disease in Contacts, in Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.