Cited by 338Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

Isavuconazole: A New Broad-Spectrum Triazole Antifungal Agent

Miceli, Marisa H., Kauffman, Carol A.·2015·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Isavuconazole is a new extended-spectrum triazole with activity against yeasts, molds, and dimorphic fungi. It is approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. Advantages of this triazole include the availability of a water-soluble intravenous formulation, excellent bioavailability of the oral formulation, and predictable pharmacokinetics in adults. A randomized, double-blind comparison clinical trial for treatment of invasive aspergillosis found that the efficacy of isavuconazole was noninferior to that of voriconazole. An open-label trial that studied primary as well as salvage therapy of invasive mucormycosis showed efficacy with isavuconazole that was similar to that reported for amphotericin B and posaconazole. In patients in these studies, as well as in normal volunteers, isavuconazole was well tolerated, appeared to have few serious adverse effects, and had fewer drug-drug interactions than those noted with voriconazole. As clinical experience increases, the role of this new triazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections will be better defined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/civ571

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New-generation triazoles have significant drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, and cross-resistance that limit their clinical applicability.

    “New-generation triazoles, such as posaconazole and voriconazole, have the advantages of extended-spectrum activity and availability for both oral and intravenous medication; however, significant drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, and cross-resistance limit their clinical applicability (6).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miceli, M. H., & Kauffman, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Miceli, Marisa H.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
61
Issue
10
Pages
1558-1565
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2114954734
Cited by
338
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 7
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
isavuconazole, triazole antifungals, invasive aspergillosis, invasive mucormycosis, dimorphic fungi, drug-drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability, adverse effects, invasive fungal infections
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Humans, Mucormycosis, Nitriles, Pyridines, Triazoles, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review