The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Appropriate Antimicrobial Use: Attempts at Opening the Black Box
Open accessAbstract
Indiscriminate antimicrobial use has plagued medicine since antibiotics were first introduced into clinical practice >70 years ago. Infectious diseases physicians and public health officials have advocated for preservation of these life-saving drugs for many years. With rising burden of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections, halting unnecessary antimicrobial use has become one of the largest public health concerns of our time. Inappropriate antimicrobial use has been quantified in various settings using numerous definitions; however, no established reference standard exists. With mounting national efforts to improve antimicrobial use, a consensus definition and standard method of measuring appropriate antimicrobial use is imperative. We review existing literature on systematic approaches to define and measure appropriate antimicrobial use, and describe a collaborative effort at developing standardized audit tools for assessing the quality of antimicrobial prescribing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of Infections
Kollef, M. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., & Fraser, V. J. (1999) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.115.2.462 · Cited by 1,805
Cited by
Antibiotics in primary care in England: which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions?
Dolk, F. C. K., Pouwels, K. B., Smith, D. R. M., Robotham, J. V., & Smieszek, T. (2018) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx504 · Cited by 312
Sulis, G., Daniels, B., Kwan, A., Gandra, S., Daftary, A., Das, J., & Pai, M. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003393 · Cited by 132
How to start an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a hospital
Mendelson, M., Morris, A. M., Thursky, K., & Pulcini, C. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.007 · Cited by 115
Chirio, D., Demonchy, E., Le Marechal, M., Gaudart, A., Lotte, R., Carles, M., & Ruimy, R. (2023) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-0667 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Spivak, E. S., Cosgrove, S. E., & Srinivasan, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-28
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2525201125
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Appropriate Antimicrobial Use: Attempts at Opening the Black Box. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciw658
- The paper
- Spivak, E. S., Cosgrove, S. E., & Srinivasan, A. (2016). Measuring Appropriate Antimicrobial Use: Attempts at Opening the Black Box. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.