Cited by 8Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAntibiotic Use and Resistance

24/7 workflow for bloodstream infection diagnostics in microbiology laboratories: the first step to improve clinical management

Chirio, David, Demonchy, Elisa, Le Marechal, Marion, Gaudart, Alice, Lotte, Romain, Carles, Michel, Ruimy, Raymond·2023·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of an uninterrupted workflow regarding blood cultures on turnaround time and antibiotic prescription. Methods Monomicrobial episodes of bacteremia were retrospectively evaluated before and after a continuous 24/7 workflow was implemented in our clinical microbiology laboratory (pre- and post-intervention periods; PREIP and POSTIP). Primary outcome was the time from specimen collection to the first change in antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the time from specimen collection to effective antibiotic therapy and to antibiotic susceptibility testing results (or turnaround time), as well as hospital length of stay and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Results A total of 548 episodes of bacteremia were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in PREIP and POSTIP regarding patient characteristics and causative bacteria. In POSTIP, the mean time to the first change in antibiotic therapy was reduced by 10.4 h (p Conclusions Around the clock processing of blood cultures allows for a reduction in turnaround time, which in turn reduces the delay until effective antibiotic therapy prescription.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2022-0667

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chirio, D., Demonchy, E., Le Marechal, M., Gaudart, A., Lotte, R., Carles, M., & Ruimy, R.
Affiliations
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
  • Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales , Hôpital l’Archet 1, CHU de Nice , Nice , France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Chirio, David
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2022-11-04
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
349-355
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W4308053020
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
bloodstream infection, bacteremia, blood culture, turnaround time, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, clinical microbiology laboratory
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Laboratories, Retrospective Studies, Bacteremia, Sepsis, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review