24/7 workflow for bloodstream infection diagnostics in microbiology laboratories: the first step to improve clinical management
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of an uninterrupted workflow regarding blood cultures on turnaround time and antibiotic prescription. Methods Monomicrobial episodes of bacteremia were retrospectively evaluated before and after a continuous 24/7 workflow was implemented in our clinical microbiology laboratory (pre- and post-intervention periods; PREIP and POSTIP). Primary outcome was the time from specimen collection to the first change in antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the time from specimen collection to effective antibiotic therapy and to antibiotic susceptibility testing results (or turnaround time), as well as hospital length of stay and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Results A total of 548 episodes of bacteremia were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in PREIP and POSTIP regarding patient characteristics and causative bacteria. In POSTIP, the mean time to the first change in antibiotic therapy was reduced by 10.4 h (p Conclusions Around the clock processing of blood cultures allows for a reduction in turnaround time, which in turn reduces the delay until effective antibiotic therapy prescription.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Around the clock BSI diagnostics is known to shorten TAT and, in turn, to reduce delays in appropriate treatment introduction.
“Around the clock BSI diagnostics is known to shorten TAT and, in turn, to reduce delays in appropriate treatment introduction [10].”
From Lab efficiency and improvements in the management of bloodstream infections: a before and after study (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paluch, M., Ettahar, N., Lagraulet, B., Cattoen, C., Rethore, E., Dubrulle, A., Abad, L., Canis, F., Wayenberg, L., Lambiotte, F., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-025-05200-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chirio, D., Demonchy, E., Le Marechal, M., Gaudart, A., Lotte, R., Carles, M., & Ruimy, R.
- Affiliations
- Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
- Service de Maladies infectieuses et Tropicales , Hôpital l’Archet 1, CHU de Nice , Nice , France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Chirio, David
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2022-11-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-355
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W4308053020
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Keywords
- bloodstream infection, bacteremia, blood culture, turnaround time, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, clinical microbiology laboratory
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Laboratories, Retrospective Studies, Bacteremia, Sepsis, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review