Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraseason Waning of Influenza Vaccine Protection: Evidence From the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network, 2011–2012 Through 2014–2015

Ferdinands, Jill M., Fry, Alicia M., Reynolds, Sue, Petrie, Joshua G., Flannery, Brendan, Jackson, Michael L., Belongia, Edward A.·2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background.: Recent studies suggest that influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) may wane over the course of an influenza season, leading to suboptimal VE during late influenza seasons. Methods.: We examined the association between influenza VE and time since vaccination among patients ≥9 years old with medically attended acute respiratory illness in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network using data pooled from the 2011–2012 through 2014–2015 influenza seasons. We used multivariate logistic regression with polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza infection as the outcome and vaccination status defined by days between vaccination and symptom onset as the predictor. Models were adjusted for calendar time and other potential confounding factors. Results.: We observed decreasing VE with increasing time since vaccination for influenza A(H3N2) (P = .004), influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (P = .01), and influenza B viruses (P = .04). Maximum VE was observed shortly after vaccination, followed by a decline in VE of about 7% (absolute) per month for influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B and 6%–11% per month for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. VE remained greater than zero for at least 6 months for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza B and at least 5 months for influenza A(H3N2) viruses. Decline in VE was more pronounced among patients with prior-season influenza vaccination. A similar pattern of increasing influenza risk with increasing time since vaccination was seen in analyses limited to vaccinees. Conclusions.: We observed decreasing influenza vaccine protection with increasing time since vaccination across influenza types/subtypes. This association is consistent with intraseason waning of host immunity, but bias or residual confounding could explain these findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciw816

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Ferdinands, J. M., Fry, A. M., Reynolds, S., Petrie, J. G., Flannery, B., Jackson, M. L., & Belongia, E. A.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-02-09
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
544-550
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2566650836
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
19.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraseason Waning of Influenza Vaccine Protection: Evidence From the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network, 2011–2012 Through 2014–2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciw816
The paper
Ferdinands, J. M., Fry, A. M., Reynolds, S., Petrie, J. G., Flannery, B., Jackson, M. L., & Belongia, E. A. (2017). Intraseason Waning of Influenza Vaccine Protection: Evidence From the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network, 2011–2012 Through 2014–2015. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.