Cited by 43Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Assessing the sensitivity of decision-analytic results to unobserved markers of risk: defining the effects of heterogeneity bias

KUNTZ, Karen M., Goldie, Sue J.·2002·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

An important assumption made when constructing a Markov model is that all persons residing in a health state are identical. Failure to adjust for population heterogeneity caused by unobserved variables can therefore cause bias in model results. The authors used a simple model to evaluate the potential impact of heterogeneity bias, defined as the percentage change in the life expectancy gain with an intervention predicted by a model that does not adjust for heterogeneity (unadjusted model) compared to one that does (adjusted model). The life expectancy gains were consistently greater in the unadjusted model compared to the adjusted model (positive bias). For an annual probability of developing disease of 1%, the heterogeneity bias exceeded 50% when the relative risk of disease with the heterogeneity factor versus without the factor was greater than 15 and the prevalence of the heterogeneity factor was between 5% and 25%. When constructing decision-analytic models, analysts need to be cognizant of unobserved factors that introduce heterogeneity into the cohort. This analysis provides a general framework to determine when issues of heterogeneity may be important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02789x02022003004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variables that affect transition probabilities but are not known at decision time, such as genetic mutation and undiagnosed infection, can create heterogeneity bias, and inclusion of such variables should be considered.

    “Variables that affect transition probabilities but are not known at decision time (e.g., genetic mutation and undiagnosed infection) can create "heterogeneity bias" [45,46], and inclusion of such variables should be considered.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KUNTZ, K. M., & Goldie, S. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
218-227
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 0000-0000
OpenAlex
W2122203485
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
heterogeneity bias, Markov model, population heterogeneity, life expectancy gains, sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding, disease risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Humans, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Risk, Sensitivity and Specificity, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review