Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens Using a Shotgun Metagenomics Approach

Open access
Thoendel, Matthew J, Jeraldo, Patricio R, Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E, Yao, Janet Z, Chia, Nicholas, Hanssen, Arlen D, Abdel, Matthew P, Patel, Robin·2018·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: Metagenomic shotgun sequencing has the potential to change how many infections, particularly those caused by difficult-to-culture organisms, are diagnosed. Metagenomics was used to investigate prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), where pathogen detection can be challenging. Methods: Four hundred eight sonicate fluid samples generated from resected hip and knee arthroplasties were tested, including 213 from subjects with infections and 195 from subjects without infection. Samples were enriched for microbial DNA using the MolYsis basic kit, whole-genome amplified, and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2500 instruments. A pipeline was designed to screen out human reads and analyze remaining sequences for microbial content using the Livermore Metagenomics Analysis Toolkit and MetaPhlAn2 tools. Results: When compared to sonicate fluid culture, metagenomics was able to identify known pathogens in 94.8% (109/115) of culture-positive PJIs, with additional potential pathogens detected in 9.6% (11/115). New potential pathogens were detected in 43.9% (43/98) of culture-negative PJIs, 21 of which had no other positive culture sources from which these microorganisms had been detected. Detection of microorganisms in samples from uninfected aseptic failure cases was conversely rare (7/195 [3.6%] cases). The presence of human and contaminant microbial DNA from reagents was a challenge, as previously reported. Conclusions: Metagenomic shotgun sequencing is a powerful tool to identify a wide range of PJI pathogens, including difficult-to-detect pathogens in culture-negative infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciy303

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Thoendel, M. J., Jeraldo, P. R., Greenwood-Quaintance, K. E., Yao, J. Z., Chia, N., Hanssen, A. D., Abdel, M. P., & Patel, R.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
1333-1338
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2800650583
Cited by
253
References
21
FWCI
22.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens Using a Shotgun Metagenomics Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciy303
The paper
Thoendel, M. J., Jeraldo, P. R., Greenwood-Quaintance, K. E., Yao, J. Z., Chia, N., Hanssen, A. D., Abdel, M. P., & Patel, R. (2018). Identification of Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens Using a Shotgun Metagenomics Approach. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.