Cited by 89Reproductive tract infections researchUrinary Tract Infections ManagementAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Vaginal Anti-infective, TOL-463, in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Randomized, Single-blind, Phase 2, Controlled Trial

Open access
Marrazzo, Jeanne M, Dombrowski, Julia C, Wierzbicki, Michael R, Perlowski, Charlotte, Pontius, Angela, Dithmer, Dwyn, Schwebke, Jane·2019·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) present serious reproductive health risks and management challenges, with poor control attributed to survival of treatment-resistant biofilm communities. Boric acid is used in various regimens for non-albicans VVC and recurrent BV. We investigated safety and efficacy of a novel boric acid-based vaginal anti-infective with enhanced antibiofilm activity (TOL-463) in treating BV and VVC. METHODS: In this phase 2 randomized, investigator-blinded trial conducted at 2 sexual health clinics, women with BV or VVC were randomly assigned (1:1) to 7 nights of TOL-463 vaginal gel or insert. The primary test of cure (TOC) was clinical cure at day 9-12; safety was assessed at TOC and day 21-30. RESULTS: One hundred six participants (53 with BV, 36 VVC, 17 both) were enrolled; most were African American (69%). Clinical cure rate of BV at TOC was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-75%) for TOL-463 insert and 50% (95% CI, 31%-69%) for TOL-463 gel, and for VVC, 92% (95% CI, 67%-99%) for TOL-463 insert and 81% (95% CI, 57%-93%) for TOL-463 gel. Both products were safe and well tolerated with no secondary cases of VVC; vulvovaginal burning was the most common adverse event (9.6%). CONCLUSIONS: TOL-463, especially in vaginal insert form, is effective and safe in treating BV and VVC. Future studies should assess the potential role of TOL-463 as a biofilm disrupter in enhancing likelihood of cure relative to approved therapies, reducing recurrence rates, and combined with traditional antimicrobials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02866227.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciy554

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]1. Muzny CA, Schwebke JR. Pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: discussion of current hypotheses. J Infect Dis 2016; 214(Suppl 1):S1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2.Diflucan [package insert]. New York, NY: Pfizer; 2018. 3.Nuvessa [package insert]. Irvine, CA: Allergan; 2016.
  2. [4]4. Marrazzo JM, Martin DH, Watts DH, et al. Bacterial vaginosis: identifying research gaps proceedings of a workshop sponsored by DHHS/NIH/NIAID. Sex Trans Dis 2010; 37:732–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [5]5. Aguin TJ, Sobel JD. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2015; 17:462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [6]6. van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Cornelisse PG, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal yeast, but not vaginal cleansing, increase HIV-1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; 48:203–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [7]7. Reichman O, Akins R, Sobel JD. Boric acid addition to suppressive antimicrobial therapy for recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36:732–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [8]8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2015. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. [9]9. Citron DM, Leoncio E, Tyrrell KL, et al. Antimicrobial activity of boric acid (BA) and TOL-463 against vaginal anaerobes causing bacterial vaginosis (BV) and urinary tract infections (UTIs). In: 12th Biennial Congress of the Anaerobe Society of the Americas, Chicago, IL, 28 June–1 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. [10]10. Citron DM, Goldstein EJC. Establishment of the MBC/MFC of boric acid and TOL-463 against culprit vaginitis pathogens and impact on protective vaginal lactobacilli. In: 54th Annual Meeting of Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, DC, 5–9 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. [11]11. Fidel PL, Lilly EA. Activity of TOL-463 against biofilms formed by Candida species in an ex vivo murine vaginitis model. In: IDWeek, San Diego, CA, 7–11 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. [12]12. Pulcini E. Effects of boric acid (BA) and TOL-463 against biofilms formed by key vaginitis pathogens Gardnerella vaginalis and Candida albicans. In: 40th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stowe, VT, 7–9 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. [13]13. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Vulvovaginal candidiasis: development of drugs for treatment, guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: CDER, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. [14]14. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Bacterial vaginosis: development of drugs for treatment, guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD: CDER, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. [16]16. Schwebke JR, Morgan FG Jr, Koltun W, Nyirjesy P. A phase-3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and safety of single oral doses of secnidazole 2 g for the treatment of women with bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217:678.e1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [17]17. Schwebke JR, Marrazzo J, Beelen AP, Sobel JD. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of metronidazole vaginal gel 1.3% in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42:376–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18.Clindesse [package insert]. New York: Perrigo Inc.; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. [19]19. Sobel JD, Ferris D, Schwebke J, et al. Suppressive antibacterial therapy with 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:1283–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [20]20. Abdelmaksoud AA, Girerd PH, Garcia EM, et al. Association between statin use, the vaginal microbiome, and Gardnerella vaginalis vaginolysin-mediated cytotoxicity. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [21]21. Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, et al. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology 2014; 160:2272–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marrazzo, J. M., Dombrowski, J. C., Wierzbicki, M. R., Perlowski, C., Pontius, A., Dithmer, D., & Schwebke, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Emmes (United States) (US)
  • Family Health International 360 (US)
Corresponding author
Marrazzo, Jeanne M
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2018-08-31
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
803-809
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2889350775
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
boric acid, bacterial vaginosis, vaginal candidiasis, vaginal insert, vaginal gel, antibiofilm activity, biofilm eradication, treatment-resistant infection, cure rate, safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anti-Infective Agents, Borates, Boric Acids, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Edetic Acid, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review