Cited by 48Influenza Virus Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and HesitancyRespiratory viral infections research

Depletion-of-susceptibles Bias in Analyses of Intra-season Waning of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness

Open access
Ray, G Thomas, Lewis, Ned, Klein, Nicola P, Daley, Matthew F, Lipsitch, Marc, Fireman, Bruce·2020·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Bias arises in studies of waning vaccine effectiveness when higher-risk individuals are depleted from the at-risk population at different rates between study groups. We examined how this bias arises and how to avoid it. A reanalysis of data from California confirmed a finding of intra-season waning of influenza vaccine effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciz706

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bias due to depletion of the susceptible population may lead to underestimation of vaccine effectiveness, even in the test-negative, case-control study design.

    “Bias due to depletion of the susceptible population may lead to underestimation of vaccine effectiveness34, even in the test-negative, case–control, study design, which is less prone to effect of this bias13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ray GT, Lewis N, Klein NP, et al. Intra-season waning of influenza vaccine effec- tiveness. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 68:1623-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, G. T., Lewis, N., Klein, N. P., Daley, M. F., Lipsitch, M., & Fireman, B.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ray, G Thomas
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2019-07-27
Volume
70
Issue
7
Pages
1484-1486
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2966530972
Cited by
48
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health (#1R01AI107721-01)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM088558)
  • Permanente Medical Group
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
influenza vaccine effectiveness, waning vaccine effectiveness, vulnerable populations
MeSH terms
Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Seasons, Vaccination, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review