The DOI matches its Crossref record.
China’s Security Strategy towards East Asia
Abstract
China has frequently been depicted by some observers as an assertive rising power. However, assertiveness is neither a theoretically rigorous nor empirically useful term. The ‘assertive China’ thesis also makes a somewhat partial argument for China’s external behaviour by primarily focusing its responses on territorial disputes. A closer examination of China’s regional security strategy reveals that it is shifting from comprehensive reassurance to conditional reassurance, combined with active coercion towards specific target states. Overall, China’s strategic transition has occurred amid profound international and regional environmental changes. In particular, the rise of China has shifted the regional balance of power in China’s favour, the United States has strengthened its strategic involvement in the region, and neighbouring countries have developed substantial concerns about China’s role there. Owing to these external and internal variations, China has been more inclined in recent years to use its coercive power to persuade neighbouring countries or to ensure that they indeed treat it with respect, yet it still pursues a strategy of general reassurance to defend its rise.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The revised security strategy of the European Union (issued in the summer of the 2016), and the first national security strategy of the Trump administration (issued in December 2017) demonstrate that western powers feel threatened by the rise of non-western powers.”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Case of Offensive Mercantilism?
Garlick, J. (2019) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1648764 · Cited by 56
Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order
OĞUZLU, H. T. (2019) · All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace · doi:10.20991/allazimuth.464076 · Cited by 49
China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance
Pu, X. (2017) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6 · Cited by 35
Rediscovering the Transition in China’s National Interest: A Neoclassical Realist Approach
Ye, X. (2019) · Journal of Current Chinese Affairs · doi:10.1177/1868102619876830 · Cited by 26
“In addition, a focus on domestic factors facilitates the development of an explanatory framework that can be used to examine a specific state’s foreign policy (Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundUnbalanced deterrence: coercive threat, reassurance and the US-China rivalry in Taiwan strait
Xiying, Z. (2019) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1697353 · Cited by 24
“China-US rivalry in political coercive threats In recent years, China has become more and more inclined to use coercion as tool in foreign policy (Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundWinds of Change: Assessing China’s Assertive Turn in Foreign Policy
Liao, N.-C. C. (2018) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/0021909618762477 · Cited by 19
To Engage or Not to Engage? Explaining the Logic of the US’s China Strategy in the Post-Cold War Era
Ye, X. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09726-7 · Cited by 16
The study of Chinese scholars in foreign policy analysis: an emerging research program
Feng, H., & He, K. (2020) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1738538 · Cited by 17
The Illusion of the China-US-Europe Strategic Triangle: Reactions from Germany and the UK
Cook, R. J., Ohle, M., & Han, Z. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09771-2 · Cited by 13
“Scholarship has offered additional theoretical lenses to engage with the debate on the coping behavior of secondary states, chiefly in the form of accommodation, buck-passing, soft-balancing, offshore-balancing and institutional-balancing [30, 39, 56, 64, 69].”
BackgroundYe, X. (2021) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096211058887 · Cited by 9
Routledge Handbook of Chinese and Eurasian International Relations
Sahakyan, M. D. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003439110 · Cited by 8
China and southeast Asia in the 2000s: Tension management in the maritime space
Zha, D., & Gong, L. (2021) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/1369148120980944 · Cited by 7
“(emphasis added by the authors (Oude Elferink, 2016: 237)) China started to adopt a more active or proactive posture in its neighbouring region even before Xi took office in 2012 (Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Geopolitical Influence on Regional Cooperation and Integration in East Asia
Hartono, A. C. (2021) · Asian Journal of Comparative Politics · doi:10.1177/20578911211037780 · Cited by 7
“This rejuvenation focuses on adopting a win-win and mutual approach, maintaining peace with neighboring countries, and pursuing regional stability (Heath, 2013; Liu, 2016; Xiao, 2016; Zhao, 2019).”
BackgroundCook, R. J., Ohle, M., & Han, Z. (2019) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1651759 · Cited by 6
The Relevance of Deep Pluralism for China’s Foreign Policy
Zhang, F., & Buzan, B. G. (2022) · The Chinese Journal of International Politics · doi:10.1093/cjip/poac014 · Cited by 6
China’s coalition-building in the Indo-Pacific: strategies of connectivity and association
Loke, B., & Xiao-li, G. (2025) · Australian Journal Of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/10357718.2025.2471351 · Cited by 5
Analyzing China’s Security Policy in East Asia within the Framework of Offensive Realism (2013–2025)
Ansary, A. K., Fazili, M. H., & Sadat, S. A. S. (2026) · Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities · doi:10.62810/jssh.v3i1.198 · Cited by 4
“For the first time, official policy documents explicitly included protecting interests beyond China’s borders as part of the mission of both the military and the diplomatic apparatus (Liu, 2016).”
InfluentialResearch on the national security risk assessment model: a case study of political security in China
Xu, Z., & Shi, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05278-w · Cited by 4
“…of China and is an urgent need to effectively maintain national security, indicating that China has begun to address the relationship between national security and national development from the perspective of national grand strategy(Goldstein, 2020; Hu, 2016; Liu, 2016; Özdemir and Karagül, 2024).”
The Thucydides Trap and the Korean Peninsula: So why Won’t the USA and China Get Caught?
Han, Z., Cook, R. J., & Ohle, M. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-018-09595-7 · Cited by 4
United States Leadership in East Asia and China’s State-by-state Approach to Regional Security
Sun, X. (2017) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0075-x · Cited by 4
Heriawan, & Abiwawanti, F. (2022) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220102.002 · Cited by 3
“Liu argued that systemic factors provide opportunities and challenges for the rising power and shape its realisation of strategic objectives.”
BackgroundInfluentialA GENUINE BLEND OF STATECRAFTS
Altin, H. (2022) · World Affairs · doi:10.1177/00438200221107398 · Cited by 3
Yu, Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2018) · International Relations of the Asia-Pacific · doi:10.1093/irap/lcy012 · Cited by 2
Ye, X. (2024) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096241287353 · Cited by 1
“This indicates that state actors are strongly inclined to use the full range of tools at their disposal, including diplomatic, economic, military, and legal tools (Liu, 2016).”
He, K., & Liu, F. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190097356.013.27 · Cited by 1
Self-citationThe Ever-growing China’s Maritime Rise and South China Sea Dispute: A Literature Review
Heriawan (2022) · Jurnal Hubungan Internasional · doi:10.20473/jhi.v15i1.33644 · Cited by 1
“But none of them has taking serious balancing act (Goh 2008; Chen & Yang 2013; Liu 2016).”
BackgroundMinimal peace in Northeast Asia: a realist-liberal explanation
Singh, B. (2022) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2022.2075441 · Cited by 1
“In terms of foreign policy, China has shown stronger assertiveness towards Taiwan, Hong Kong, Australia and India, as well as in its maritime territorial disputes in the South China Sea and East China Sea (Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundPeaceful Change in Northeast Asia
Singh, B. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190097356.013.41
Altundağ, S. (2023) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub167.c870
A Wetland Management Planning: Problems and Threats Affecting Gökçeada (Aydıncık-Salt Lake) Lagoon
BAYRAK, M. (2023) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub167.c756
The Usage of Emotional Intelligence in Workplaces: Research on a Telecommunications Company
Babayiğit, A., & Babayiğit, H. A. (2023) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub167.c869
The Kingmaker’s Conundrum: South Korea Navigating the Sino-US Peer Competition
Cook, R. J., Ohle, M., & Han, Z. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37612-2_6
Psychology as a system component: the deterrence logic of communication in China
Chung, Y. (2024) · International Politics · doi:10.1057/s41311-024-00558-9
“Separate or mutually exclusive policy discourses ‘can be used at the same time and mixed strategies are a common choice for leaders and strategic planners’ (Liu 2016, 157).”
Trần, N. D., & Nguyễn, D. T. (2023) · VNU Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.4884
“Do đó, chính sách của Trung Quốc đối với Đông Nam Á cũng mang tính cưỡng ép và khiến các nước phải e sợ nhiều hơn (Feng, 2016, tr. 151-179).”
China’s Rise, China’s Regional Initiatives, and Japan’s Perception of China
Küçükdeğirmenci, O. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-7578-1_6
Shaheen, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-3716-4_10
Xu, W. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0768-9_1
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, F.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Feng
- ORCID
- Liu, Feng
- Venue
- The Chinese Journal of International Politics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-179
- ISSN
- 1750-8916 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8924
- OpenAlex
- W2407940037
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Chinese Journal of International Politics (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Maritime Security and History
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
- Keywords
- East Asia, regional security, territorial disputes, coercive power, reassurance, balance of power, emerging powers, China's rise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review