The DOI matches its Crossref record.
China’s Security Strategy towards East Asia
Abstract
China has frequently been depicted by some observers as an assertive rising power. However, assertiveness is neither a theoretically rigorous nor empirically useful term. The ‘assertive China’ thesis also makes a somewhat partial argument for China’s external behaviour by primarily focusing its responses on territorial disputes. A closer examination of China’s regional security strategy reveals that it is shifting from comprehensive reassurance to conditional reassurance, combined with active coercion towards specific target states. Overall, China’s strategic transition has occurred amid profound international and regional environmental changes. In particular, the rise of China has shifted the regional balance of power in China’s favour, the United States has strengthened its strategic involvement in the region, and neighbouring countries have developed substantial concerns about China’s role there. Owing to these external and internal variations, China has been more inclined in recent years to use its coercive power to persuade neighbouring countries or to ensure that they indeed treat it with respect, yet it still pursues a strategy of general reassurance to defend its rise.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The revised security strategy of the European Union (issued in the summer of the 2016), and the first national security strategy of the Trump administration (issued in December 2017) demonstrate that western powers feel threatened by the rise of non-western powers.”
From Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Case of Offensive Mercantilism?
Garlick, J. (2019) · Europe Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1648764 · Cited by 56
Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order
OĞUZLU, H. T. (2019) · All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace · doi:10.20991/allazimuth.464076 · Cited by 49
China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance
Pu, X. (2017) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6 · Cited by 35
Rediscovering the Transition in China’s National Interest: A Neoclassical Realist Approach
Ye, X. (2019) · Journal of Current Chinese Affairs · doi:10.1177/1868102619876830 · Cited by 26
“In addition, a focus on domestic factors facilitates the development of an explanatory framework that can be used to examine a specific state’s foreign policy (Liu, 2016).”
BackgroundUnbalanced deterrence: coercive threat, reassurance and the US-China rivalry in Taiwan strait
Xiying, Z. (2019) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2019.1697353 · Cited by 24
“China-US rivalry in political coercive threats In recent years, China has become more and more inclined to use coercion as tool in foreign policy (Liu, 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, F.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Feng
- ORCID
- Liu, Feng
- Venue
- The Chinese Journal of International Politics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-179
- ISSN
- 1750-8916 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8924
- OpenAlex
- W2407940037
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Chinese Journal of International Politics (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Maritime Security and History
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
- Keywords
- East Asia, regional security, territorial disputes, coercive power, reassurance, balance of power, emerging powers, China's rise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review