CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exploring circular economy transition pathways: a roadmap analysis of 15 Canadian local governments

Rajaonson, Juste, Chembessi, Chedrak·2024·Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society
DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsae015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper explores how 15 Canadian local governments of various sizes and contexts are transitioning to a circular economy by analysing their roadmap currently in development. It provides qualitative insights into how physical, socioeconomic and institutional factors are influencing the content of roadmaps, along with their similarities and differences. Drawing from the literature on the geography of transitions, we show that while local physical and socioeconomic attributes typically shape the roadmaps by determining likely activities, their actual trajectory varies based on the roadmap instigators and the broader institutional contexts in which they operate. The findings suggest the importance of local governments supporting the roadmap instigators while also recognising that circular economy transition pathways can capitalise on policies and programs not only locally but beyond local boundaries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cjres/rsae015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Andersen, 2007, An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy, Sustainability Science, 2, 133, 10.1007/s11625-006-0013-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Avelino, 2016, Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18, 628, 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bauer, 2019, Local initiatives and global regimes–Multi-scalar transition dynamics in the chemical industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 172, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.140 · DOI
  4. Beaurain, 2023, Investigating the cultural dimension of circular economy: A pragmatist perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 138012, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138012 · DOI
  5. Bolger, 2019, Circular cities: exploring local government strategies to facilitate a circular economy, European Planning Studies, 27, 2184, 10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bourdin, 2022, Circularities in territories: opportunities & challenges, European Planning Studies, 30, 1183, 10.1080/09654313.2021.1973174 · DOI
  7. Bridge, 2013, Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy, Energy Policy, 53, 331, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 · DOI
  8. CCRI - Canadian Circular Cities & Regions Initiative, 2023, Canada’s circular cities and regions initiative is leading the circular transition
  9. Chang, 2020, Malaysia’s Circular Cities Blueprint: A Vision and Action Plan to Inspire Transformation
  10. Chedrak, 2023, ‘A fine wine, better with age’: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS), Journal of Industrial Ecology, 27, 1593, 10.1111/jiec.13441 · DOI
  11. Chembessi, 2023, Narrating the interplay between circular economy and ecological transition: A social and cultural perspective from CE Experiments in Kamouraska (Quebec) and La Rochelle (France), Circular Economy, 1, 1, 10.55845/TYET5083 · DOI
  12. Chembessi, 2021, Understanding the scaling-up of a Circular Economy through a strategic niche management (SNM) theory: A socio-political perspective from Quebec, Environmental Challenges, 5, 100362, 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100362 · DOI
  13. Coenen, 2012, Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions, Research Policy, 41, 968, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 · DOI
  14. Domenech, 2019, Transition towards a resource efficient circular economy in Europe: policy lessons from the EU and the member states, Ecological Economics, 155, 7, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001 · DOI
  15. Fastenrath, 2018, Lost in transition? Directions for an economic geography of urban sustainability transitions, Sustainability, 10, 2434, 10.3390/su10072434 · DOI
  16. Frantzeskaki, 2012, Governing societal transitions to sustainability, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15, 19, 10.1504/IJSD.2012.044032 · DOI
  17. Fuenfschilling, 2014, The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Research Policy, 43, 772, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010 · DOI
  18. Garud, 2007, Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue, Organization Studies, 28, 957, 10.1177/0170840607078958 · DOI
  19. Grillitsch, 2020, Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces, Progress in Human Geography, 44, 704, 10.1177/0309132519853870 · DOI
  20. Grillitsch, 2023, Agency and economic change in regions: Identifying routes to new path development using qualitative comparative analysis, Regional Studies, 57, 1453, 10.1080/00343404.2022.2053095 · DOI
  21. Gue, 2021, Causal network maps of urban circular economies, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 1, 1
  22. Hansen, 2015, The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 92, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001 · DOI
  23. Hodson, 2010, Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were, Research Policy, 39, 477, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020 · DOI
  24. Karstensen, 2019, Circular Economy Initiatives in Norway
  25. Kirchherr, 2017, Conceptualising the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kristensen, 2023, Leadership and governance challenges in delivering place-based transformation through Smart Specialisation, Regional Studies, 57, 196, 10.1080/00343404.2022.2090536 · DOI
  27. Lawhon, 2012, Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions, Progress in Human Geography, 36, 354, 10.1177/0309132511427960 · DOI
  28. Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Liu, 2021, An Introduction to Circular Economy, 10.1007/978-981-15-8510-4 · DOI
  30. Loorbach, 2010, Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework, Governance, 23, 161, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x · DOI
  31. Maassen, 2012, Heterogeneity of lock-in and the role of strategic technological interventions in urban infrastructural transformations, European Planning Studies, 20, 441, 10.1080/09654313.2012.651807 · DOI
  32. Marjanović, 2022, Uncovering the Holistic Pathways to Circular Cities—The Case of Alberta, Canada, Highlights of Sustainability, 1, 65, 10.54175/hsustain1020006 · DOI
  33. Mavi, 2019, Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: Common weight analysis for malmquist productivity index, Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 651, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.069 · DOI
  34. Murphy, 2015, Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 73, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002 · DOI
  35. Niang, 2020, L’économie circulaire, quels enjeux de développement pour les territoires, Développement Durable et Territoires, 11, 1
  36. OECD, 2020, The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions: Synthesis Report, 10.1787/10ac6ae4-en · DOI
  37. Prendeville, 2017, Circular cities: Mapping six cities in transition, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 171, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rohracher, 2014, The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: The eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect, Urban Studies, 51, 1415, 10.1177/0042098013500360 · DOI
  39. Russell, 2020, Getting the ball rolling: An exploration of the drivers and barriers towards the implementation of bottom-up circular economy initiatives in Amsterdam and Rotterdam, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63, 1903, 10.1080/09640568.2019.1690435 · DOI
  40. Smol, 2023, Inventory and comparison of performance indicators in circular economy roadmaps of the European countries, Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3, 557, 10.1007/s43615-021-00127-9 · DOI
  41. Sotarauta, 2021, The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the North, European Urban and Regional Studies, 28, 92, 10.1177/0969776420944995 · DOI
  42. Strambach, 2020, Transition topology: Capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability, Research Policy, 49, 104006, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104006 · DOI
  43. Susur, 2019, The emergence of regional industrial ecosystem niches: A conceptual framework and a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1642, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.163 · DOI
  44. Tura, 2019, Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 90, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · DOI
  45. Varjú, 2022, Efforts and barriers shifting a city region towards circular transition – lessons from a living lab from Pécs, Hungary, Future Cities and Environment, 8, 1
  46. White, 2006, Content analysis: A flexible methodology, Library Trends, 55, 22, 10.1353/lib.2006.0053 · DOI
  47. Williams, 2023, Circular cities: planning for circular development in European cities, European Planning Studies, 31, 14, 10.1080/09654313.2022.2060707 · DOI
  48. Wirth, 2013, Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8, 20, 10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rajaonson, J., & Chembessi, C.
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2024-05-30
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
459-481
ISSN
  • 1752-1378
  • 1752-1386
DOI
10.1093/cjres/rsae015
Cited by
23
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review