Cited by 138Advanced Statistical Process MonitoringClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFault Detection and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Combined Shewhart-Cusum control chart for improved quality control in clinical chemistry

Westgard, J O, Groth, T, Aronsson, T, de Verdier, C H·1977·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

We describe the adaptation of the decision limit cumulative sum method (cusum) to internal quality control in clinical chemistry. With the decision limit method, the cusum is interpreted against a numerical limit, rather than by use of a V-mask. The method can be readily implemented in computerized quality-control systems or manually on controls charts. We emphasize the manual application here and demonstrate how the technique can be implemented on existing Shewhart or Levey-Jennings control charts. This permits both cusum and Shewhart control rules to be used simultaneously on a single control chart and also minimizes the data calculations necessary for the cusum method. Computer simulation studies are used to determine the performance characteristics of several different cusum rules, alone and in combination with a Shewhart rule. These studies indicate that improvements in existing quality-control systems should be possible by addition of this simple cusum method and by use of a combined Shewhart-cusum control chart. This should be particularly advantageous when introducing the cusum method in laboratories with manual quality-control systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/23.10.1881

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Error approaches, including frequentist statistics, are widely used for quality control in laboratory medicine.

    “Error approaches, including frequentist statistics, are widely used for quality control in laboratory medicine.20,22,73,74”

    From Uncertainty in Measurement and Total Error (2017) · cites this paper as [73]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Westgard, J. O., Groth, T., Aronsson, T., & de Verdier, C. H.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
1977-10-01
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1881-1887
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2136487613
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
Shewhart control charts, CUSUM control chart, internal quality control, Levey-Jennings charts
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Clinical, Computers, Decision Making, Models, Theoretical, Probability, Quality Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review