The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine
Abstract
The chloric acid method is most commonly used to obtain accurate and reproducible measurements of iodine and remove interfering substances. Unfortunately chloric acid is a potential hazard, requiring an explosion-proof hood, among other precautions. We have developed a simple, convenient, and economic method for measuring urinary iodine by using 1 mol/L ammonium persulfate, a nonexplosive, nonhazardous chemical, as the oxidizing reagent. The oxidation procedure can be completed in 30 min at a temperature of 91-95 degrees C. The iodine in the urine is then measured by a modification of the traditional colorimetric method of Sandell and Kolthoff. Urine samples (110) collected from a mixed population of healthy males and females, ranging in age from 6 to 79 years and living in the US, were analyzed for urine iodine content by two methods: the proposed ammonium persulfate method and the chloric acid method. The ammonium persulfate method has an intraassay CV of 9.1% at 0.42 +/- 0.04 micromol/L (mean +/- SD), 7.8% at 1.46 +/- 0.11 micromol/L, and 4.0% at 3.54 +/- 0.14 micromol/L. The interassay CV is 10.2% at 0.46 +/- 0.05 micromol/L, and 7.9% at 3.27 +/- 0.26 micromol/L. Recovery of iodine added to urine in vitro was 107%, 94%, and 97% for 0.42 micromol/L, 0.77 micromol/L and 3.64 micromol/L, respectively. The lower limit of detectability was 0.0034 microgram of iodine. Values for iodine in 110 urines measured by the reference chloric acid method ranged from 0.06 to 8.03 micromol/L and by the ammonium persulfate method from 0.05 to 7.4 micromol/L. The persulfate method (y) correlated extremely closely with the reference chloric acid method (x) by the Pearson correlation (y = 0.923x + 0.810 micromol/L, and r = 0.994, Sy/x = 1.841).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gowachirapant, S., Jaiswal, N., Melse-Boonstra, A., Galetti, V., Stinca, S., Mackenzie, I., Thomas, S., Thomas, T., Winichagoon, P., Srinivasan, K., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30332-7 · Cited by 143
Trumpff, C., De Schepper, J., Vanderfaeillie, J., Vercruysse, N., Van Oyen, H., Moreno-Reyes, R., Tafforeau, J., Vanderpas, J., & Vandevijvere, S. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7115450 · Cited by 52
Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration and psychomotor development at preschool age
Trumpff, C., De Schepper, J., Vanderfaeillie, J., Vercruysse, N., Van Oyen, H., Moreno-Reyes, R., Tafforeau, J., & Vandevijvere, S. (2016) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-310006 · Cited by 42
Nunes, N., Valente, S., Ferraz, S., Barreto, M. C., & de Carvalho, M. A. A. P. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101613 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Pino, S., Fang, S. L., & Braverman, L. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-243
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2127767245
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/42.2.239
- The paper
- Pino, S., Fang, S. L., & Braverman, L. E. (1996). Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.2.239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.