Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine

Pino, S, Fang, S L, Braverman, L E·1996·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

The chloric acid method is most commonly used to obtain accurate and reproducible measurements of iodine and remove interfering substances. Unfortunately chloric acid is a potential hazard, requiring an explosion-proof hood, among other precautions. We have developed a simple, convenient, and economic method for measuring urinary iodine by using 1 mol/L ammonium persulfate, a nonexplosive, nonhazardous chemical, as the oxidizing reagent. The oxidation procedure can be completed in 30 min at a temperature of 91-95 degrees C. The iodine in the urine is then measured by a modification of the traditional colorimetric method of Sandell and Kolthoff. Urine samples (110) collected from a mixed population of healthy males and females, ranging in age from 6 to 79 years and living in the US, were analyzed for urine iodine content by two methods: the proposed ammonium persulfate method and the chloric acid method. The ammonium persulfate method has an intraassay CV of 9.1% at 0.42 +/- 0.04 micromol/L (mean +/- SD), 7.8% at 1.46 +/- 0.11 micromol/L, and 4.0% at 3.54 +/- 0.14 micromol/L. The interassay CV is 10.2% at 0.46 +/- 0.05 micromol/L, and 7.9% at 3.27 +/- 0.26 micromol/L. Recovery of iodine added to urine in vitro was 107%, 94%, and 97% for 0.42 micromol/L, 0.77 micromol/L and 3.64 micromol/L, respectively. The lower limit of detectability was 0.0034 microgram of iodine. Values for iodine in 110 urines measured by the reference chloric acid method ranged from 0.06 to 8.03 micromol/L and by the ammonium persulfate method from 0.05 to 7.4 micromol/L. The persulfate method (y) correlated extremely closely with the reference chloric acid method (x) by the Pearson correlation (y = 0.923x + 0.810 micromol/L, and r = 0.994, Sy/x = 1.841).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/42.2.239

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Pino, S., Fang, S. L., & Braverman, L. E.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
239-243
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2127767245
Cited by
348
References
0
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/42.2.239
The paper
Pino, S., Fang, S. L., & Braverman, L. E. (1996). Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.2.239

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.