Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge?

Carraro, Paolo, Servidio, Giuseppe, Plebani, Mario·2000·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Clinical laboratories must improve the preanalytical phase, a phase highly susceptible to mistakes (1). In some reports, hemolyzed specimens, the most common reason for rejection, account for ∼60% of rejected specimens, fivefold more than the second most common cause (2). Cellular contents can falsely increase values for some plasma constituents, such as potassium, lactate dehydrogenase, and aspartate aminotransferase (3). Moreover, hemolysis produces spectrophotometric interference with other laboratory methods. In vitro hemolysis depends mainly on the way in which the blood samples are drawn and treated, and it may in particular depend on the blood being forced through too fine a needle (4) or through the large-bore needle of a syringe into a tube; it may also be caused by shaking the tube too vigorously and/or centrifuging blood specimens before clotting is complete. In vivo hemolysis, on the other hand, may have at least 50 causes. We evaluated the causes of hemolysis in samples received by our STAT section in the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the University Hospital of Padova, which performs all clinical chemistry tests on specimens collected using lithium heparin as anticoagulant (Becton Dickinson).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Carraro, P., Servidio, G., & Plebani, M.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
306-307
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2168782664
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306
The paper
Carraro, P., Servidio, G., & Plebani, M. (2000). Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge? Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.