The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge?
Abstract
Clinical laboratories must improve the preanalytical phase, a phase highly susceptible to mistakes (1). In some reports, hemolyzed specimens, the most common reason for rejection, account for ∼60% of rejected specimens, fivefold more than the second most common cause (2). Cellular contents can falsely increase values for some plasma constituents, such as potassium, lactate dehydrogenase, and aspartate aminotransferase (3). Moreover, hemolysis produces spectrophotometric interference with other laboratory methods. In vitro hemolysis depends mainly on the way in which the blood samples are drawn and treated, and it may in particular depend on the blood being forced through too fine a needle (4) or through the large-bore needle of a syringe into a tube; it may also be caused by shaking the tube too vigorously and/or centrifuging blood specimens before clotting is complete. In vivo hemolysis, on the other hand, may have at least 50 causes. We evaluated the causes of hemolysis in samples received by our STAT section in the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the University Hospital of Padova, which performs all clinical chemistry tests on specimens collected using lithium heparin as anticoagulant (Becton Dickinson).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691 · Cited by 850
Self-citationHaemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories
Lippi, G., Blanckaert, N., Bonini, P., Green, S., Kitchen, S., Palicka, V., Vassault, A. J., & Plebani, M. (2008) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/cclm.2008.170 · Cited by 466
Self-citationPreanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality
Lippi, G., Chance, J. J., Church, S., Dazzi, P., Fontana, R., Giavarina, D., Grankvist, K., Huisman, W., Kouri, T., Palicka, V., et al. (2011) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/cclm.2011.600 · Cited by 388
Self-citationInfluence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing
Lippi, G., Luca Salvagno, G., Montagnana, M., Brocco, G., & Cesare Guidi, G. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm.2006.054 · Cited by 344
Potassium Homeostasis and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors
Weir, M. R., & Rolfe, M. (2010) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.07821109 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Carraro, P., Servidio, G., & Plebani, M.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-307
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2168782664
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306
- The paper
- Carraro, P., Servidio, G., & Plebani, M. (2000). Hemolyzed Specimens: A Reason for Rejection or a Clinical Challenge? Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.