The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pitfalls in the Measurement of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Abstract
Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a protein with antiapoptotic, mitogenic, and permeability-increasing activities specific for vascular endothelium. VEGF mRNA, which has five isoforms, is produced by nonmalignant cells in response to hypoxia and inflammation and by tumor cells in constitutively high concentrations. Because VEGF plays a crucial role in physiological and pathophysiological angiogenesis, measurements of circulating VEGF are of diagnostic and prognostic value, e.g., in cardiovascular failures, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies. However, there are major quantitative differences in the published results. This review attempts to identify reasons for these disparities. Approach: The literature was reviewed through a Medline search covering 1995 to 2000. A selection of exemplary references had to be made for this perspective overview. Content: Data are included from studies on healthy humans, gynecological patients, and persons suffering from inflammatory or malignant diseases. The results indicate that competitive immunoassays detect the total amount of circulating VEGF, which enables observations regarding the increase in VEGF in pregnancy and preeclampsia to be made. In these cases, capture immunoassays utilizing neutralizing antibodies are insufficient because of an accompanying increase in VEGF-binding soluble receptors (sFlt-1). Measurements of circulating free VEGF are useful for study of malignant diseases, which are associated with both genetically and hypoxia-induced overproduction of VEGF. The VEGF isoform specificity of the antibodies is also critical because both VEGF121 and VEGF165 are secreted. It is important to consider that platelets and leukocytes release VEGF during blood clotting. Conclusions: Future efforts should concentrate on the balance between free VEGF, total VEGF, and sFlt-1. Plasma, rather than serum, should be used for analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maynard, S. E., Min, J.-Y., Merchan, J., Lim, K.-H., Li, J., Mondal, S., Libermann, T. A., Morgan, J. P., Sellke, F. W., Stillman, I. E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci17189 · Cited by 4,101
Li, X. (2004) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v10.i19.2878 · Cited by 290
Liu, X., Shen, M., Qi, Q., Zhang, H., & Guo, S.-W. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew018 · Cited by 190
High-altitude hypoxia and preeclampsia
Zamudio, S. (2007) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/2286 · Cited by 97
Endothelial Permeability and Hemostasis in Septic Shock
Hou, P. C., Filbin, M. R., Wang, H., Ngo, L., Huang, D. T., Aird, W. C., Yealy, D. M., Angus, D. C., Kellum, J. A., & Shapiro, N. I. (2017) · Chest · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.010 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Jelkmann, W.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 617-623
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2134648032
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pitfalls in the Measurement of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/47.4.617
- The paper
- Jelkmann, W. (2001). Pitfalls in the Measurement of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.4.617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.