The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blood Glutathione Disulfide: In Vivo Factor or in Vitro Artifact?
Open accessAbstract
Background: The reported mean concentration of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) in human blood/erythrocytes varies widely (1 to >500 μmol/L), as does that of reduced glutathione (GSH) to a lesser extent. We have identified and investigated possible pitfalls in measurement of both GSH and GSSG. Methods: We measured GSH and GSSG using a spectrophotometer with a modification of the GSH recycling method; the same samples were also measured by reversed-phase HPLC after derivatization of thiols (dithiothreitol was used to reduce disulfides) with monobromobimane. The thiol-bimane adduct was measured by a fluorescence detector. Results: Measured GSH/GSSG concentrations were affected by the following: (a) oxidation of thiols in acidified samples; (b) oxidation after restoring neutral-alkaline pH; (c) oxidation during acid deproteinization; (d) shift in the GSH/GSSG equilibrium because of irreversible blocking of free thiols; and (e) reaction of electrophiles with amino groups. In particular, oxidation during sample deproteinization with acid influenced and produced artifacts (30–150 μmol/L GSSG was produced by this procedure); this phenomenon was directly correlated with the presence of oxygenated hemoglobin, being minimized by both oxygen deprivation and incubation in an atmosphere of 5% carbon monoxide. Conclusions: GSSG is present in healthy human blood at low concentrations (2–6 μmol/L), and most published data on GSSG may be affected by artifacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomarkers of Oxidative Damage in Human Disease
Dalle-Donne, I., Rossi, R., Colombo, R., Giustarini, D., & Milzani, A. (2006) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.061408 · Cited by 1,703
Self-citationMeasurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans
Marrocco, I., Altieri, F., & Peluso, I. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/6501046 · Cited by 855
Metabolite Measurement: Pitfalls to Avoid and Practices to Follow
Lu, W., Su, X., Klein, M. S., Lewis, I. A., Fiehn, O., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044952 · Cited by 462
Analysis of GSH and GSSG after derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide
Giustarini, D., Dalle-Donne, I., Milzani, A., Fanti, P., & Rossi, R. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.095 · Cited by 332
Self-citationExercise-Induced Oxidative Stress: Myths, Realities and Physiological Relevance
Vollaard, N. B. J., Shearman, J. P., & Cooper, C. E. (2005) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200535120-00004 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossi, R., Milzani, A., Dalle-Donne, I., Giustarini, D., Lusini, L., Colombo, R., & Di Simplicio, P.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 742-753
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2132860985
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Glutathione Disulfide: In Vivo Factor or in Vitro Artifact? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/48.5.742
- The paper
- Rossi, R., Milzani, A., Dalle-Donne, I., Giustarini, D., Lusini, L., Colombo, R., & Di Simplicio, P. (2002). Blood Glutathione Disulfide: In Vivo Factor or in Vitro Artifact? Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.5.742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.