Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of a High-Throughput Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Urinary Cortisol and Cortisone

Taylor, Robert L, Machacek, Dwaine, Singh, Ravinder J·2002·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: Urinary free cortisol and cortisone measurements are useful in evaluation of Cushing syndrome, apparent mineralocorticoid excess, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and adrenal insufficiency. To reduce analytical interference, improve accuracy, and shorten the analysis time, we developed a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for urinary cortisol and cortisone. Methods: We added 190 pmol (70 ng) of stable isotope cortisol-9,11,12,12-d4 to 0.5 mL of urine as an internal standard before extraction. The urine was extracted with 4.5 mL of methylene chloride, washed, and dried, and 10 μL of the reconstituted extract was injected onto a reversed-phase C18 column and analyzed using a tandem mass spectrometer operating in the positive mode. Results: Multiple calibration curves for urinary cortisol and cortisone exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility in the range 7–828 nmol/L (0.25–30 μg/dL). Interassay CVs were 7.3–16% for mean concentrations of 6–726 nmol/L (0.2–26.3 μg/dL) for cortisol and cortisone. The detection limit was 6 nmol/L (0.2 μg/dL). Recovery of cortisol and cortisone added to urine was 97–123%. The regression equation for the LC-MS/MS (y) and HPLC (x) method for cortisol was: y = 1.11x + 0.03 μg cortisol/24 h (r2 = 0.992; n = 99). The regression equation for the LC-MS/MS (y) and immunoassay (x) methods for cortisol was: y = 0.66x − 12.1 μg cortisol/24 h (r2 = 0.67; n = 99). Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the LC-MS/MS method for urinary free cortisol and cortisone offer advantages over routine immunoassays or chromatographic methods because of elimination of drug interferences, high throughput, and short chromatographic run time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1511

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, R. L., Machacek, D., & Singh, R. J.
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
1511-1519
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W1917375005
Cited by
219
References
3
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a High-Throughput Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Urinary Cortisol and Cortisone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1511
The paper
Taylor, R. L., Machacek, D., & Singh, R. J. (2002). Validation of a High-Throughput Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Urinary Cortisol and Cortisone. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.9.1511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.