The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mesophilic Aeromonads in Human Disease: Current Taxonomy, Laboratory Identification, and Infectious Disease Spectrum
Abstract
The importance of the genus Aeromonas in human disease has recently become better appreciated through the use of improved methodologies for the recovery and identification of aeromonads from biologic specimens and as a result of medical studies aimed at determining the clinical significance of these bacteria when isolated from localized and invasive infections of humans. Taxonomic schemes currently allow for the identification of six Aeromonas species (five mesophilic and one psychrophilic), four of the five mesophilic species having been recovered from infectious processes or isolated from clinical material of human origin. Two major categories of human illness attributed to Aeromonas species have been observed: acute gastroenteritis in both pediatric and adult populations and disseminated disease (e.g., bacteremia) in persons with underlying hematologic malignancies or hepatic dysfunctions. Although the role of mesophilic aeromonads as important agents of bacterial gastroenteritis remains unconfirmed because of the inability to fulfill Koch's postulates (no animal model), several lines of compelling clinical and laboratory evidence indicate that these microorganisms are significant enteric pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Genus Aeromonas : Taxonomy, Pathogenicity, and Infection
Janda, J. M., & Abbott, S. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00039-09 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationAbbott, S. L., Cheung, W. K. W., & Janda, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.41.6.2348-2357.2003 · Cited by 454
Self-citationAeromonas spp. clinical microbiology and disease
Parker, J. L., & Shaw, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2010.12.003 · Cited by 443
Janda, J. M. (1991) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.4.4.397 · Cited by 377
Self-citationCaleb, O. J., Mahajan, P. V., Al-Said, F. A.-J., & Opara, U. L. (2013) · Food and Bioprocess Technology · doi:10.1007/s11947-012-0932-4 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Janda, J. M., & Duffey, P. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 980-997
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2086153343
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesophilic Aeromonads in Human Disease: Current Taxonomy, Laboratory Identification, and Infectious Disease Spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/10.5.980
- The paper
- Janda, J. M., & Duffey, P. S. (1988). Mesophilic Aeromonads in Human Disease: Current Taxonomy, Laboratory Identification, and Infectious Disease Spectrum. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/10.5.980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.