The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Drugs, Microorganisms, and Phagocytes
Abstract
The literature on the interaction between antimicrobial drugs, microorganisms, and phagocytes is reviewed. Critical assessment of the methods used in various studies is indispensable in the interpretation of results. The available data seldom permit firm conclusions, but a number of interactions can be postulated. Chemotaxis is influenced by beta-lactam antibiotics, which induce an increased release of chemoattractants from bacteria; inhibitors of protein synthesis (erythromycin, tetracyclines) reduce the release of chemoattractants. Rifampin and tetracyclines inhibit chemotactic activity of granulocytes. Phagocytosis is diminished by tetracyclines and bacitracin. Intracellular killing is impaired by trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. Antimicrobial drugs that inhibit protein synthesis alter the surface of bacteria, changing the opsonic requirements for phagocytosis. Antimicrobial agents that act on the cell wall or disrupt the organization of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria increase bacterial vulnerability to the lethal action of granulocytes. Cellular enzymes of granulocytes act synergistically with a variety of drugs. Synergism between monocytes and penicillins has also been shown. The degree of penetration of an antimicrobial drug into phagocytic cells is not correlated with the intracellular activity of the drug. Polymyxin B, colistin, rifampin, vancomycin, clindamycin, and quinolones kill bacteria phagocytosed by granulocytes. Penicillins, rifampin, and chloramphenicol show microbicidal activity against bacteria ingested by monocytes or macrophages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tipper, D. J., & Strominger, J. L. (1965) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.54.4.1133 · Cited by 1,008
Cited by
Targeted delivery of antibiotics using liposomes and nanoparticles: research and applications
Pinto-Alphandary, H., Andremont, A., & Couvreur, P. (2000) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00121-1 · Cited by 428
Niewold, T. A. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.4.605 · Cited by 414
Intracellular distribution and activity of antibiotics
Tulkens, P. M. (1991) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/bf01964420 · Cited by 289
Intracellular pharmacodynamics of antibiotics
Carryn, S., Chanteux, H., Seral, C., Mingeot-Leclercq, M.-P., Van Bambeke, F., & Tulkens, P. M. (2003) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0891-5520(03)00066-7 · Cited by 201
Liposome delivery of ciprofloxacin against intracellular Francisella tularensis infection
Wong, J. P., Yang, H., Blasetti, K. L., Schnell, G., Conley, J., & Schofield, L. N. (2003) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00358-4 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Broek, P. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-245
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2071162264
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Drugs, Microorganisms, and Phagocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/11.2.213
- The paper
- van den Broek, P. J. (1989). Antimicrobial Drugs, Microorganisms, and Phagocytes. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/11.2.213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.