The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia: Risk Factors for Infection
Abstract
We describe an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (vanA phenotype) bacteremia on the oncology ward of a tertiary care community hospital. In 10 of the 11 cases the patients had leukemia and were neutropenic (median duration of neutropenia, 21 days) at the time of bacteremia. On average, patients received six antibiotic agents for a total of 61 agent-days prior to development of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia. The mortality rate was 73%. Molecular typing of 22 isolates revealed that the majority (83%) represented a common strain, indicating nosocomial spread. When the 11 cases were compared to 22 matched control patients, gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (odds ratio [denominator, 0] infinity, P = .005) and the use of antimicrobial agents with significant activity against anaerobes (metronidazole, clindamycin, and imipenem; odds ratio infinity, P = .02) were found to be risk factors for the development of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia. Since no proven therapy for such infection exists, there is an urgent need to identify effective measures to prevent and control the development of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980–1989.
Banerjee, S. N., Emori, T. G., Culver, D. H., Gaynes, R. P., Jarvis, W. R., Horan, T., Edwards, J. R., Tolson, J., Henderson, T., Martone, W. J., et al. (1991) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90349-3 · Cited by 880
Cited by
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Cetinkaya, Y., Falk, P., & Mayhall, C. G. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.686 · Cited by 1,163
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?
Bonten, M. J., Willems, R., & Weinstein, R. A. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00145-1 · Cited by 400
Selective pressure by antibiotic use in livestock
Witte, W. (2000) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00301-0 · Cited by 315
Historical Yearly Usage of Vancomycin
Kirst, H. A., Thompson, D. G., & Nicas, T. I. (1998) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.42.5.1303 · Cited by 276
McDonald, L. C., Kuehnert, M. J., Tenover, F. C., & Jarvis, W. R. (1997) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0303.970307 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Edmond, M. B., Ober, J. F., Weinbaum, D. L., Pfaller, M. A., Hwang, T., Sanford, M. D., & Wenzel, R. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1126-1133
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2091288343
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia: Risk Factors for Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/20.5.1126
- The paper
- Edmond, M. B., Ober, J. F., Weinbaum, D. L., Pfaller, M. A., Hwang, T., Sanford, M. D., & Wenzel, R. P. (1995). Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia: Risk Factors for Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/20.5.1126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.