Cited by 84Viral Infections and VectorsViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence Against Person-to-Person Transmission of Hantavirus to Health Care Workers

Abstract

Unusual, primarily pulmonary, manifestations of hantaviral illness occurring in the southwestern United States raised the possibility of person-to-person transmission of a recently recognized hantavirus, Sin Nombre virus. To determine whether such transmission had occurred among health care workers (HCWs) exposed to patients with confirmed hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, we evaluated HCWs who had cared for patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome or who had processed specimens from these patients. Information about exposure to these patients and about recent illnesses was obtained via a standardized questionnaire. Serum specimens were tested for IgM and IgG antibodies to hantaviruses with use of ELISAs. Of the 396 HCWs, 266 (67%) reported that they had been exposed to patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome or to their body fluids or that they had processed laboratory specimens from these patients. Although 108 (27%) of the HCWs reported fever, myalgias, or respiratory illnesses during the 3 months before the serum specimens were obtained, hantavirus antibodies were not detected in any HCW. These data suggest that person-to-person transmission of Sin Nombre virus is unlikely to occur in health care settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/22.5.824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from comparative studies does not support human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection, with the exception of 1 prospective cohort study in Chile with serious risk of bias and no unexposed comparison group.

    “Evidence from comparative studies (the strongest level of evidence available) does not support human-to-human transmission of hantavirus infection [12, 15, 27, 34, 36, 38], with the exception of 1 prospective cohort study in Chile with serious RoB and no unexposed comparison group [29].”
  • In Vitek 1996, use of some form of PPE was high (82% reported using gloves and 80% reported using some type of mask in all encounters with HPS patients).

    “Use of some form of PPE was high (eg, 82% reported using gloves and 80% reported using some type of mask [but no mention of characteristics] in all their encounters with HPS patients).”
  • In Vitek 1996, there were no statistically significant differences between exposed and unexposed healthcare workers in the percentage reporting any symptoms of illness since 1 April 1993.

    “There were no statistically significant differences between exposed and unexposed HCWs in the percentage reporting any symptoms of illness since 1 April 1993.”
  • In Vitek 1996, none of the 396 participants had serological evidence of recent or past hantavirus infection.

    “None of the 396 participants had serological evidence of recent or past hantavirus infection.”
  • In Vitek 1996, 70.6% of participants reported exposure to patients with HPS.

    “70.6% reported exposure to patients with HPS.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vitek, C. R., Breiman, R. F., Ksiazek, T. G., Rollin, P. E., McLaughlin, J. C., Umland, E. T., Nolte, K. B., Loera, A., Sewell, C. M., & Peters, C. J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Vitek, C. R.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1996-05-01
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
824-826
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2072625946
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
Sin Nombre virus, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, human-to-human transmission, healthcare workers, occupational exposure, hantavirus antibodies, laboratory-acquired infection, nosocomial transmission
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Health Personnel, Orthohantavirus, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Male, Middle Aged, Southwestern United States, Cluster Analysis, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review