The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Human Salmonellosis: I. Infective Dose
Abstract
The notion that large inocula of salmonellae are necessary to induce illness in humans is based on the results of studies involving volunteers. However, investigations of outbreaks of salmonellosis suggest that the infective dose was often low. This incongruity was investigated by an examination of factors that could affect the infective dose of Salmonella, a review of nine studies in which salmonellae were administered to volunteers, and a review of 11 outbreaks of salmonellosis for which the infective doses could be calculated. Determination of the minimal infective doses from studies involving volunteers is limited by the strains used for testing, repeated testing of the same subjects, and the use of too few volunteers at the lower dose levels. In six of the 11 outbreaks, the actual doses ingested were calculated to be less than 10(3) organisms; the outbreaks with higher doses involved very high rates of attack and short periods of incubation. Data presented on median incubation periods during 12 typhoid outbreaks suggest that low doses were involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control
Hornick, R. B., Greisman, S. E., Woodward, T. E., DuPont, H. L., Dawkins, A. T., & Snyder, M. J. (1970) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197009242831306 · Cited by 565
INOCULATION SYPHILIS IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS
MAGNUSON, H. J., THOMAS, E. W., OLANSKY, S., KAPLAN, B. I., MELLO, L. D., & CUTLER, J. C. (1956) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/00005792-195602000-00002 · Cited by 273 · cited 2×
“With many pathogenic microorganisms, there is an inverse relationship between the size of the inoculum and the incubation period for the illness produced [2-4].”
Background
Cited by
Enteric bacterial toxins: mechanisms of action and linkage to intestinal secretion
Sears, C. L., & Kaper, J. B. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.1.167-215.1996 · Cited by 508
Animal models of infections: enteritis versus typhoid fever
Santos, R. L., Zhang, S., Tsolis, R. M., Kingsley, R. A., Garry Adams, L., & Bäumler, A. J. (2001) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01495-2 · Cited by 450
Acid resistance in enteric bacteria
Gorden, J., & Small, P. L. (1993) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.61.1.364-367.1993 · Cited by 444
Molecular Basis of the Interaction of Salmonella with the Intestinal Mucosa
Darwin, K. H., & Miller, V. L. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.3.405 · Cited by 435
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the community setting
Furuya, E. Y., & Lowy, F. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1325 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaser, M. J., & Newman, L. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-11-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1096-1106
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2067855529
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Human Salmonellosis: I. Infective Dose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/4.6.1096
- The paper
- Blaser, M. J., & Newman, L. S. (1982). A Review of Human Salmonellosis: I. Infective Dose. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/4.6.1096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.