The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacteremia in Narcotic Addicts at the Detroit Medical Center. II. Infectious Endocarditis: A Prospective Comparative Study
Abstract
For one year all narcotic addicts admitted to the Detroit Medical Center with infectious endocarditis (74 cases) were compared with a control group of bacteremic addicts who had other infections (106 cases). Endocarditis was caused by Staphylococcus aureus (60.8% of cases), streptococci (16.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.5%), mixed bacteria (8.1%), and Corynebacterium JK (1.4%). S. aureus endocarditis most frequently involved the tricuspid valve; streptococci infected left-sided valves significantly more often than other organisms (P = .001). Biventricular and multiple-valve infections were commonest in patients with pseudomonas endocarditis (P = .05). Two-dimensional echocardiography, when combined with an abnormal chest roentgenogram, was highly predictive of endocarditis. Bacteremia in the absence of endocarditis was associated with primary skin and soft tissue infection, mycotic aneurysm at the site of narcotic injection, septic arthritis, septic thrombophlebitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, mediastinal abscess, and unclassified infection. Polymicrobial bacteremia in the nonendocarditis group was associated with markedly increased morbidity. Mild hyponatremia occurred in 41% of all patients and was also associated with significantly increased morbidity. Analysis of the two groups disclosed similarities and differences with implications for the pathophysiology and treatment of addicts with bacteremic infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009)
Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and by the International Society of Chemotherapy (ISC) for Infection and Cancer, Habib, G., Hoen, B., Tornos, P., Thuny, F., Prendergast, B., Vilacosta, I., Moreillon, P., de Jesus Antunes, M., Thilen, U., et al. (2009) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp285 · Cited by 2,014
Baddour, L. M., Wilson, W. R., Bayer, A. S., Fowler, V. G., Bolger, A. F., Levison, M. E., Ferrieri, P., Gerber, M. A., Tani, L. Y., Gewitz, M. H., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.165564 · Cited by 1,707
Sakoulas, G., Moise-Broder, P. A., Schentag, J., Forrest, A., Moellering, R. C., & Eliopoulos, G. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.42.6.2398-2402.2004 · Cited by 836
Levine, D. P., Fromm, B. S., & Reddy, B. R. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-9-674 · Cited by 577
Self-citationBacterial Infections in Drug Users
Gordon, R. J., & Lowy, F. D. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra042823 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, D. P., Crane, L. R., & Zervos, M. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 374-396
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2097179758
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteremia in Narcotic Addicts at the Detroit Medical Center. II. Infectious Endocarditis: A Prospective Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinids/8.3.374
- The paper
- Levine, D. P., Crane, L. R., & Zervos, M. J. (1986). Bacteremia in Narcotic Addicts at the Detroit Medical Center. II. Infectious Endocarditis: A Prospective Comparative Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/8.3.374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.