The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship of MIC and Bactericidal Activity to Efficacy of Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Open accessAbstract
We attempted to find a relationship between the microbiological properties of bloodstream isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the efficacy of vancomycin in the treatment of bacteremia. Vancomycin susceptibility testing was performed, and bactericidal activity was determined for 30 isolates from 30 different patients with MRSA bacteremia for whom clinical and microbiological outcome data were available. The majority of these patients had been previously enrolled in multicenter prospective studies of MRSA bacteremia refractory to conventional vancomycin therapy. Logistic regression found a statistically significant relationship between treatment success with vancomycin and decreases in both vancomycin MICs (≤0.5 μg/ml versus 1.0 to 2.0 μg/ml; P = 0.02) and degree of killing (reduction in 1og 10 CFU/milliliter) by vancomycin over 72 h of incubation in vitro ( P = 0.03). For MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs ≤ 0.5 μg/ml, vancomycin was 55.6% successful in the treatment of bacteremia whereas vancomycin was only 9.5% effective in cases in which vancomycin MICs for MRSA were 1 to 2 μg/ml. Patients with MRSA that was more effectively killed at 72 h by vancomycin in vitro had a higher clinical success rate with vancomycin therapy in the treatment of bacteremia (log 10 < 4.71 [ n = 9], 0%; log 10 4.71 to 6.26 [ n = 13], 23.1%; log 10 > 6.27 [ n = 8], 50%). We conclude that a significant risk for vancomycin treatment failure in MRSA bacteremia begins to emerge with increasing vancomycin MICs well within the susceptible range. Elucidating the mechanisms involved in intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance in S. aureus should begin by examining bacteria that begin to show changes in vancomycin susceptibility before the development of obvious resistance. Prognostic information for vancomycin treatment outcome in MRSA bacteremia may also be obtained by testing the in vitro bactericidal potency of vancomycin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-818_5 · Cited by 12,025
Cosgrove, S. E., Sakoulas, G., Perencevich, E. N., Schwaber, M. J., Karchmer, A. W., & Carmeli, Y. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/345476 · Cited by 1,964
Self-citationNosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States
Richards, M. J., Edwards, J. R., Culver, D. H., & Gaynes, R. P. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199905000-00020 · Cited by 1,565
Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis: A Consequence of Medical Progress
Fowler, V. G., Miro, J. M., Hoen, B., Cabell, C. H., Abrutyn, E., Rubinstein, E., Corey, G. R., Spelman, D., Bradley, S. F., Barsic, B., et al. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.24.3012 · Cited by 1,174
Levine, D. P., Fromm, B. S., & Reddy, B. R. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-9-674 · Cited by 577
Vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in intravenous drug users
Small, P. M., & Chambers, H. F. (1990) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.34.6.1227 · Cited by 399
KORZENIOWSKI, O., & SANDE, M. A. (1982) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-97-4-496 · Cited by 355
Fridkin, S. K., Hageman, J., McDougal, L. K., Mohammed, J., Jarvis, W. R., Perl, T. M., Tenover, F. C., & the Vancomycin‐Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Epidemiology Study Group (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/346207 · Cited by 344
(1996) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/s0196-6553(96)90026-7 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Mermel, L. A., Allon, M., Bouza, E., Craven, D. E., Flynn, P., O'Grady, N. P., Raad, I. I., Rijnders, B. J. A., Sherertz, R. J., & Warren, D. K. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/599376 · Cited by 3,638
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Self-citationHowden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
van Hal, S. J., Lodise, T. P., & Paterson, D. L. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir935 · Cited by 512
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakoulas, G., Moise-Broder, P. A., Schentag, J., Forrest, A., Moellering, R. C., & Eliopoulos, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2398-2402
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2044368480
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship of MIC and Bactericidal Activity to Efficacy of Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.42.6.2398-2402.2004
- The paper
- Sakoulas, G., Moise-Broder, P. A., Schentag, J., Forrest, A., Moellering, R. C., & Eliopoulos, G. M. (2004). Relationship of MIC and Bactericidal Activity to Efficacy of Vancomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.6.2398-2402.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.