Cited by 227Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindfulness training and problem formulation.

Teasdale, John D., Segal, Zindel V., Williams, J. Mark G.·2003·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Evidence suggests mindfulness-based clinical interven-tions are effective. Accepting this, we caution against as-suming that mindfulness can be applied as a generic tech-nique across a range of disorders without formulating how the approach addresses the factors maintaining the disorder in question. Six specific issues are raised: mind-fulness has been found to be unhelpful in some contexts; where mindfulness has been found to be effective, in-structors have derived and shared with clients a clear problem formulation; there may be many dimensions of effectiveness underlying the apparent simplicity of mind-fulness; mindfulness was developed within a particular “view ” of emotional suffering that implies wider changes that go beyond meditation practice alone; professionals need to match the different components of mindfulness with the psychopathology being targeted; nonetheless, mindfulness may affect processes common to different pathologies. Key words: mindfulness, meditation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness training, problem for-mulation. [Clin Psychol Sci Prac 10: 157–160, 2003] Baer (2003; this issue) provides a very helpful and thoughtful overview of the current status of mindfulness training as a clinical intervention. The literature Baer re-views suggests that the apparently simple procedure of teaching people to pay attention “in a particular way ” has benefits across a wide range of disorders. Further, it seems that, in some situations, these benefits can be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clipsy.bpg017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MBIs promote acting with awareness and intention instead of reacting impulsively, facilitating the shift from automatic responses to deliberate and mindful reactions.

    “MBIs promote acting with awareness and intention instead of reacting impulsively, facilitating the shift from automatic responses to deliberate and mindful reactions (López-Navarro et al., 2015; Teasdale, 2003; Williston et al., 2021 ).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 227

Authors
Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., & Williams, J. M. G.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Bangor University (GB)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2003
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
157-160
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2124129154
Cited by
227
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness training, problem formulation, mindfulness-based interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, meditation, emotional pain, psychopathology, treatment effectiveness, group therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review