Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 933

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Information Measure for Classification

Open access
Wallace, C. S., Boulton, D. M.·1968·The Computer Journal

Abstract

This paper derives a measure of the goodness of a classification based on information theory. A classification is regarded as a method of economical statistical encoding of the available attribute information. The measure may be used to compare the relative goodness of classifications produced by different methods or as the basis of a classification procedure. A classification program, ‘SNOB’, has been written for the University of Sydney KDF 9 computer, and first tests show good agreement with conventional taxonomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/comjnl/11.2.185

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, C. S., & Boulton, D. M.
Venue
The Computer Journal
Published
1968-08-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
185-194
ISSN
  • 0010-4620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2067
OpenAlex
W2110381504
Cited by
933
References
1
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.