Cited by 14AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeCognitive Computing and Networks

Knowledge acquisition with forgetting: an incremental and developmental setting

Open access
Martínez-Plumed, Fernando, Ferri, Cèsar, Hernández-Orallo, José, Ramírez-Quintana, María J·2015·Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

Identifying the balance between remembering and forgetting is the key to abstraction in the human brain and, therefore, the creation of memories and knowledge. We present an incremental, lifelong view of knowledge acquisition which tries to improve task after task by determining what to keep, consolidate and forget, overcoming the stability–plasticity dilemma. Our framework can combine any rule-based inductive engine (which learns new rules) with a deductive engine (which derives a coverage graph for all rules) and integrate them into a lifelong learner. We rate rules by introducing several metrics through the first adaptation, to our knowledge, of the minimum message length (MML) principle to a coverage graph, a hierarchical assessment structure which handles evidence and rules in a unified way. The metrics are used to forget some of the worst rules and also to consolidate those selected rules that are promoted to the knowledge base. This mechanism is also mirrored by a demotion system. We evaluate the framework with a series of tasks in a chess rule learning domain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059712315608675

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solutions to forgetting may be required to maintain performance over many tasks.

    “Solutions to forgetting such as (Mart´ ınez-Plumed et al. 2015) may be required to maintain performance over many tasks.”

    From Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Martínez-Plumed et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-Plumed, F., Ferri, C., Hernández-Orallo, J., & Ramírez-Quintana, M. J.
Affiliations
  • DSIC, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Venue
Adaptive Behavior
Published
2015-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
283-299
ISSN
  • 1059-7123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2633
OpenAlex
W2224049000
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TIN 2013-45732-C4-1-P, PCIN-2013-037)
  • Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO2011/052)
  • CHIST-ERA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
knowledge acquisition, forgetting, lifelong learning, stability-plasticity dilemma, minimum message length, rule selection, knowledge consolidation, demotion, incremental learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review