Cited by 61Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolAvian ecology and behavior

Using fecal glucocorticoids for stress assessment in mourning doves

Open access
Washburn, Brian E., Millspaugh, Joshua J., Schulz, John H., Jones, Susan B., Mong, Tony·2003·The Condor

Abstract

Fecal glucocorticoid assays provide a potentially useful, noninvasive means to study physiological responses of wildlife to various stressors. The objective of our study was to validate a method for measuring glucocorticoid metabolites in Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) feces. We validated the assay using standard procedures (e.g., parallelism, recovery of exogenous corticosterone) to demonstrate that the assay accurately and precisely measured glucocorticoid metabolites in Mourning Dove fecal extracts. We conducted adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) challenge experiments to validate the assay's ability to determine biologically important changes in fecal glucocorticoids. Fecal glucocorticoid levels increased significantly approximately 2–3 hr after administration of ACTH at 50 IU per kg body mass to wild Mourning Doves held in captivity. In contrast, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites did not increase in control birds, birds that received saline injections, or a lower dose of ACTH (1 IU per kg body mass). Variation in overall fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels may have been influenced by season and the length of time birds were held in captivity. Noninvasive fecal glucocorticoid metabolite analyses, in combination with demographic information, may have considerable utility for monitoring the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances on Mourning Dove populations. Uso de Glucocorticoides Fecales Para Evaluar el Estrés en Zenaida macroura Resumen. Las evaluaciones de glucocorticoides fecales representan un medio no invasor potencialmente útil para estudiar las respuestas fisiológicas de los animales silvestres ante agentes causantes de estrés. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue validar un método para medir metabolitos glucocorticoides en heces de palomas Zenaida macroura. Validamos el método mediante procedimientos estándar (e.g., paralelismo, recuperación de corticosterona exógena) para demostrar que éste mide con exactitud y precisión los metabolitos glucocorticoides en extractos fecales de Z. macroura. Realizamos experimentos de desafío con adrenocorticotropina (ACTH) para validar la habilidad que tenía el método para determinar cambios biológicamente importantes en los glucocorticoides fecales. Los niveles de glucocorticoides fecales aumentaron de forma significativa aproximadamente 2–3 hr después de la administración de ACTH a 50 IU por kg de peso corporal a palomas silvestres mantenidas en cautiverio. En contraste, los metabolitos glucocorticoides fecales no aumentaron en aves control, ni en aves que recibieron inyecciones salinas o una menor dosis de ACTH (1 IU por kg de peso corporal). La variación en los niveles generales de metabolitos glucocorticoides fecales podría haber sido influenciada por la estación y la longitud del período de tiempo en que las aves fueron mantenidas en cautiverio. Los análisis no invasores de metabolitos glucocorticoides, en combinación con información demográfica, podrían ser de considerable utilidad para monitorear los efectos de los disturbios naturales y antropogénicos sobre las poblaciones de Z. macroura.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/condor/105.4.696

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. CLIPSHAM, R. C. 1991. Restraint, sample collection and surgical preparation in the avian patient, p. 331- 340. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the association of avian veterinarians. Association of Avian Veterinarians, New York.
  2. GROTJAN, H. E., AND B. A. KEEL. 1996. Data interpre- tation and quality control, p. 51-93. In E. P. Dia- mandis and T. K. Christopoulos [EDS.], Immuno- assay. Academic Press, New York.
  3. HAMILTON, G. D., AND H. P. WEEKS JR. 1985. Cortisol and aldosterone comparisons of cottontail rabbits collected by shooting, trapping, and falconry. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 31:40-42.
  4. HARVEY, S., J. G. PHILLIPS, A. REES, AND T. R. HALL. 1984. Stress and adrenal function. Journal of Ex- perimental Zoology 232:633-645.
  5. HOLMES, W. N., AND J. G. PHILLIPS. 1976. The adrenal cortex of birds, p. 293-420. In I. Chester-Jones and I. Henderson [EDS.], General and comparative endocrinology of the adrenal cortex. Academic Press, New York.
  6. JEFFCOATE, S. L. 1981. Efficiency and effectiveness in the endocrinology laboratory. Academic Press, New York.
  7. LUDDERS, J. W., J. A. LANGENBERG, N. M. CZEKALA, AND H. N. ERB. 2001. Fecal corticosterone reflects serum corticosterone in Florida Sandhill Cranes. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37:646-652.
  8. MARRA, P. P., K. T. LAMPE, AND B. L. TEDFORD. 1995. Plasma corticosterone levels in two species of Zo- notrichia sparrows under captive and free-ranging conditions. Wilson Bulletin 107:296-305.
  9. MILLSPAUGH, J. J., R. J. WOODS, K. E. HUNT, K. J. RAEDEKE, G. C. BRUNDIGE, B. E. WASHBURN, AND S. K. WASSER. 2001. Fecal glucocorticoid assays and the physiological stress response of elk. Wild- life Society Bulletin 29:899-907.
  10. NETER, J., W. WASSERMAN, AND M. H. KUTNER. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. 3rd ed. Irwin Press, Boston.
  11. In J. P. Gosling [ED.], Immunoassays. Oxford University Press, New York.
  12. ROMERO, L. M., K. K. SOMA, AND J. C. WINGFIELD. 1998b. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis changes allow seasonal modulation of corticoste- rone in a bird. American Journal of Physiology 274:R1338-R1344.
  13. ROMERO, L. M., AND J. C. WINGFIELD. 2001. Regula- tion of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in free-living pigeons. Journal of Comparative Phys- iology B 171:231-235.
  14. SCHULZ, J. H., A. J. BERMUDEZ, J. L. TOMLINSON, J. D. FIRMAN, AND Z. HE. 2001. Comparison of radio- transmitter attachment techniques using captive Mourning Doves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 771-782.
  15. SCHWARZENBERGER, F., E. MO ¨STL, E. BAMBERG, J. PAM- MER, AND O. SCHMEHLIK. 1991. Concentrations of progestagens and oestrogens in the faeces of preg- nant Lipizzan, trotter and thoroughbred mares. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 44:489-499.
  16. TESKEY-GERSTL, A., E. BAMBERG, T. STEINECK, AND R. PALME. 2000. Excretion of corticosteroids in urine and feces of hares (Lepus europaeus). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 170:163-168.
  17. WINGFIELD, J. C. 1988. Changes in reproductive func- tion of free-living birds in direct response to en- vironmental perturbations, p. 121-148. In J. H. Stetson [ED.], Processing of environmental infor- mation in vertebrates. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  18. In S. Harvey and R. J. Etches [EDS.], Perspectives in avian endocrinol- ogy. Journal of Endocrinology Ltd., Bristol, UK.
  19. WINGFIELD, J. C., P. DEVICHE, S. SHARBOUGH, L. B. ASTHEIMER, R. HOLBERTON, R. SUYDAM, AND K. HUNT. 1994. Seasonal changes in the adrenocor- tical responses to stress in Redpolls, Acanthis flammea, in Alaska. Journal of Experimental Zo- ology 270:372-380.
  20. WINGFIELD, J. C., C. M. VLECK, AND M. C. MOORE. 1992. Seasonal changes in the adrenocortical re- sponse to stress in birds of the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Experimental Zoology 264:419-428.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Washburn, B. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Schulz, J. H., Jones, S. B., & Mong, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Missouri Department of Conservation (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
The Condor
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
696-706
ISSN
  • 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5129
OpenAlex
W2009199576
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ornithological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Missouri
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
fecal glucocorticoids, stress measurement, mourning dove, Zenaida macroura, non-invasive biomarkers, ACTH challenge, corticosterone, assay validation, captive birds, seasonal variation, population monitoring, avian stress response, sex differences in stress response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review