The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybridity in Cultural Globalization
Open accessAbstract
Hybridity has become a master trope across many spheres of cultural research, theory, and criticism, and one of the most widely used and criticized concepts in postcolonial theory. This article begins with a thorough review of the interdisciplinary scholarship on hybridity. Then it revisits the trope of hybridity in the context of a series of articles on cultural globalization published in the Washington Post in 1998. This series on “American Popular Culture Abroad” appropriates hybridity to describe the global reception of U.S. American popular culture. Due to the controversy surrounding hybridity, the discourse woven into these articles invites a critical deconstruction. A discussion of the implications of hybridity's conceptual ambiguity follows. Finally, this article makes the case that hybridity is a conceptual inevitability, and proposes an intercontextual theory of hybridity, which comprehends global cultural dynamics by articulating hybridity and hegemony, providing an initial theoretical platform for a critical cultural transnationalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization.
de Zoysa, D. A., & Appadurai, A. (1998) · International Migration Review · doi:10.2307/2547675 · Cited by 18,135
Bhabha, H. K. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 14,203
The End of History and the Last Man
Fukuyama, F. (1992) · Cited by 7,535
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80966-1 · Cited by 7,457
Jehlen, M., & Said, E. W. (1994) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2946944 · Cited by 6,527
The End of History and the Last Man.
Fritzsche, P., & Fukuyama, F. (1992) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2164782 · Cited by 6,496
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040011 · Cited by 5,395
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
Evans, P., & Huntington, S. P. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654621 · Cited by 4,865
The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness.
Erickson, P., & Gilroy, P. (1997) · African American Review · doi:10.2307/3042577 · Cited by 4,759
A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present
Spivak, G. C. (1999) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf541 · Cited by 4,152
Cited by
Hybridity and the rise of Korean popular culture in Asia
Shim, D. (2006) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443706059278 · Cited by 549
Rogers, R. A. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00277.x · Cited by 469
Paffenholz, T. (2015) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908 · Cited by 364
Cottrell, M., Preston, J. P., & Pearce, J. (2012) · Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education · doi:10.1080/15595692.2012.715103 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraidy, M. M.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 316-339
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017852019
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 26.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybridity in Cultural Globalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ct/12.3.316
- The paper
- Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Hybridity in Cultural Globalization. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/12.3.316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.