Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? * Position Paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology

Ovize, M., Baxter, G. F., Di Lisa, F., Ferdinandy, P., Garcia-Dorado, D., Hausenloy, D. J., Heusch, G., Vinten-Johansen, J., Yellon, D. M., Schulz, R.·2010·Cardiovascular Research

Abstract

Ischaemic postconditioning (brief periods of ischaemia alternating with brief periods of reflow applied at the onset of reperfusion following sustained ischaemia) effectively reduces myocardial infarct size in all species tested so far, including humans. Ischaemic postconditioning is a simple and safe manoeuvre, but because reperfusion injury is initiated within minutes of reflow, postconditioning must be applied at the onset of reperfusion. The mechanisms of protection by postconditioning include: formation and release of several autacoids and cytokines; maintained acidosis during early reperfusion; activation of protein kinases; preservation of mitochondrial function, most strikingly the attenuation of opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP). Exogenous recruitment of some of the identified signalling steps can induce cardioprotection when applied at the time of reperfusion in animal experiments, but more recently cardioprotection was also observed in a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Indeed, studies in patients with an acute myocardial infarction showed a reduction of infarct size and improved left ventricular function when they underwent ischaemic postconditioning or pharmacological inhibition of MPTP opening during interventional reperfusion. Further animal studies and large-scale human studies are needed to determine whether patients with different co-morbidities and co-medications respond equally to protection by postconditioning. Also, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms must be improved to develop new therapeutic strategies to be applied at reperfusion with the ultimate aim of limiting the burden of ischaemic heart disease and potentially providing protection for other organs at risk of reperfusion injury, such as brain and kidney.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cvr/cvq129

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Ovize, M., Baxter, G. F., Di Lisa, F., Ferdinandy, P., Garcia-Dorado, D., Hausenloy, D. J., Heusch, G., Vinten-Johansen, J., Yellon, D. M., & Schulz, R.
Venue
Cardiovascular Research
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
406-423
ISSN
0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087126389
Cited by
502
References
5
FWCI
45.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? * Position Paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cvr/cvq129
The paper
Ovize, M., Baxter, G. F., Di Lisa, F., Ferdinandy, P., Garcia-Dorado, D., Hausenloy, D. J., Heusch, G., Vinten-Johansen, J., Yellon, D. M., & Schulz, R. (2010). Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? * Position Paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvq129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.