Cited by 12DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

DDRprot: a database of DNA damage response-related proteins

Open access
Andrés-León, Eduardo, Cases, Ildefonso, Arcas, Aida, Rojas, Ana M.·2016·Database

Abstract

The DNA Damage Response (DDR) signalling network is an essential system that protects the genome's integrity. The DDRprot database presented here is a resource that integrates manually curated information on the human DDR network and its sub-pathways. For each particular DDR protein, we present detailed information about its function. If involved in post-translational modifications (PTMs) with each other, we depict the position of the modified residue/s in the three-dimensional structures, when resolved structures are available for the proteins. All this information is linked to the original publication from where it was obtained. Phylogenetic information is also shown, including time of emergence and conservation across 47 selected species, family trees and sequence alignments of homologues. The DDRprot database can be queried by different criteria: pathways, species, evolutionary age or involvement in (PTM). Sequence searches using hidden Markov models can be also used.Database URL: http://ddr.cbbio.es.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/database/baw123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrés-León, E., Cases, I., Arcas, A., & Rojas, A. M.
Affiliations
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
Rojas, Ana M.
Venue
Database
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Pages
baw123
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514094657
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (FP7-REGPOT-2012-2013-1)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • FP7 Research Potential of Convergence Regions (REGPOT-2012-2013-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
DNA damage response, protein databases, post-translational modification, protein-protein interaction network, phylogenetic analysis, protein annotation, genome stability, hidden Markov models, sequence homology search
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Animals, DNA Damage, Humans, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review