The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MetaGeneAnnotator: Detecting Species-Specific Patterns of Ribosomal Binding Site for Precise Gene Prediction in Anonymous Prokaryotic and Phage Genomes
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in DNA sequencers are accelerating genome sequencing, especially in microbes, and complete and draft genomes from various species have been sequenced in rapid succession. Here, we present a comprehensive gene prediction tool, the MetaGeneAnnotator (MGA), which precisely predicts all kinds of prokaryotic genes from a single or a set of anonymous genomic sequences having a variety of lengths. The MGA integrates statistical models of prophage genes, in addition to those of bacterial and archaeal genes, and also uses a self-training model from input sequences for predictions. As a result, the MGA sensitively detects not only typical genes but also atypical genes, such as horizontally transferred and prophage genes in a prokaryotic genome. In this paper, we also propose a novel approach for analyzing the ribosomal binding site (RBS), which enables us to detect species-specific patterns of the RBSs. The MGA has the ingenious RBS model based on this approach, and precisely predicts translation starts of genes. The MGA also succeeds in improving prediction accuracies for short sequences by using the adapted RBS models (96% sensitivity and 93% specificity for 700 bp fragments). These features of the MGA expedite wide ranges of microbial genome studies, such as genome annotations and metagenome analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes
Kurokawa, K., Itoh, T., Kuwahara, T., Oshima, K., Toh, H., Toyoda, A., Takami, H., Morita, H., Sharma, V. K., Srivastava, T. P., et al. (2007) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsm018 · Cited by 869
Self-citation
Cited by
The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST)
Overbeek, R., Olson, R., Pusch, G. D., Olsen, G. J., Davis, J. J., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., Gerdes, S., Parrello, B., Shukla, M., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1226 · Cited by 4,524
Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota
Atarashi, K., Tanoue, T., Oshima, K., Suda, W., Nagano, Y., Nishikawa, H., Fukuda, S., Saito, T., Narushima, S., Hase, K., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12331 · Cited by 2,872
Self-citationPhages rarely encode antibiotic resistance genes: a cautionary tale for virome analyses
Enault, F., Briet, A., Bouteille, L., Roux, S., Sullivan, M. B., & Petit, M.-A. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.90 · Cited by 441
The Bacterial Mobile Resistome Transfer Network Connecting the Animal and Human Microbiomes
Hu, Y., Yang, X., Li, J., Lv, N., Liu, F., Wu, J., Lin, I. Y. C., Wu, N., Weimer, B. C., Gao, G. F., et al. (2016) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01802-16 · Cited by 371
High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research
Di Bella, J. M., Bao, Y., Gloor, G. B., Burton, J. P., & Reid, G. (2013) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2013.08.011 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Noguchi, H., Taniguchi, T., & Itoh, T.
- Venue
- DNA Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-10-17
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 387-396
- ISSN
- 1340-2838 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-1663
- OpenAlex
- W2162704968
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MetaGeneAnnotator: Detecting Species-Specific Patterns of Ribosomal Binding Site for Precise Gene Prediction in Anonymous Prokaryotic and Phage Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/dnares/dsn027
- The paper
- Noguchi, H., Taniguchi, T., & Itoh, T. (2008). MetaGeneAnnotator: Detecting Species-Specific Patterns of Ribosomal Binding Site for Precise Gene Prediction in Anonymous Prokaryotic and Phage Genomes. DNA Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsn027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.