Cited by 154Insect Utilization and EffectsInsect behavior and control techniquesNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Dynamic Effects of Initial pH of Substrate on Biological Growth and Metamorphosis of Black Soldier Fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae)

Ma, Junhua, Lei, Yanyan, Rehman, Kashif ur, Yu, Ziniu, Zhang, Jibin, Li, Wu, Li, Qing, Tomberlin, Jeffery K +1 more·2018·Environmental Entomology

Abstract

Edible insects have become a recognized alternative and sustainable source of high-quality proteins and fats for livestock or human consumption. In the production process of black soldier fly (BSF), (Hermetia illucens L. [Diptera: Stratiomyidae]), initial substrate pH is a critical parameter to ensure the best value of insect biomass, life history traits, and quality bio-fertilizer. This study examined the impact of initial pH values on BSF larvae production, development time, and adult longevity. The BSF were reared on artificial diet with initial pH of 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0; the control was set at 7.0. Final BSF larval weight was significantly greater in substrates having initial pH 6.0 (0.21 g), control 7.0 (0.20 g), and 10.0 (0.20 g) with no significant difference among them, whereas larval weight reared with initial pH 2.0 and 4.0 were lowest at 0.16 g (-23%). Prepupal weight was greatest when larvae were reared on substrates with initial pH 6.0 (0.18 g), control 7.0 (0.19 g), 8.0 (0.18 g), and 10.0 (0.18 g). In contrast, the prepupal weight of larvae reared on diets with initial pH 2.0 was lowest at 0.15 g (-22%). Larval development time was 21.19 d at pH 8.0, about 3 d (12.5%) shorter than that of those reared on diets with initial pH 6.0, 7.0 control, and 10.0. In all treatments, pH shifted to 5.7 after 3-4 d and 8.5 after 16-17 d except for two groups (2.0 and 4.0) where the pH remained slightly acidic 5.0 and 6.5, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ee/nvx186

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, J., Lei, Y., Rehman, K. U., Yu, Z., Zhang, J., Li, W., Li, Q., Tomberlin, J. K., & Zheng, L.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Longyu
Venue
Environmental Entomology
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
159-165
ISSN
  • 0046-225X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2936
OpenAlex
W2783102697
Cited by
154
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (31301913)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (2662015QD006)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, larval development, larval weight, adult longevity, metamorphosis, edible insects, artificial diet, insect rearing, biofertilizers
MeSH terms
Life History Traits, Animals, Animal Feed, Diet, Diptera, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Larva, Metamorphosis, Biological, Pupa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review