Cited by 21Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Influence of cusp morphology and sex on quantitative valve composition in severe aortic stenosis

Open access
Patel, Kush P, Lin, Andrew, Kumar, Niraj, Esposito, Giulia, Grodecki, Kajetan, Lloyd, Guy, Mathur, Anthony, Baumbach, Andreas +6 more·2023·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Aims: Aortic stenosis is characterized by fibrosis and calcification of the valve, with a higher proportion of fibrosis observed in women. Stenotic bicuspid aortic valves progress more rapidly than tricuspid valves, which may also influence the relative composition of the valve. We aimed to investigate the influence of cusp morphology on quantitative aortic valve composition quantified from contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography in severe aortic stenosis. Methods and results: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with bicuspid and tricuspid valves were propensity matched 1:1 by age, sex, and comorbidities. Computed tomography angiograms were analysed using semi-automated software to quantify the fibrotic and calcific scores (volume/valve annular area) and the fibro-calcific ratio (fibrotic score/calcific score). The study population (n = 140) was elderly (76 ± 10 years, 62% male) and had a peak aortic jet velocity of 4.1 ± 0.7 m/s. Compared with those with tricuspid valves (n = 70), patients with bicuspid valves (n = 70) had higher fibrotic scores [204 (interquartile range 118–267) vs. 144 (99–208) mm3/cm2, P = 0.006] with similar calcific scores (P = 0.614). Women had greater fibrotic scores than men in bicuspid [224 (181–307) vs. 169 (109–247) mm3/cm2, P = 0.042] but not tricuspid valves (P = 0.232). Men had greater calcific scores than women in both bicuspid [203 (124–355) vs. 130 (70–182) mm3/cm2, P = 0.008] and tricuspid [177 (136–249) vs. 100 (62–150) mm3/cm2, P = 0.004] valves. Among both valve types, women had a greater fibro-calcific ratio compared with men [tricuspid 1.86 (0.94–2.56) vs. 0.86 (0.54–1.24), P = 0.001 and bicuspid 1.78 (1.21–2.90) vs. 0.74 (0.44–1.53), P = 0.001]. Conclusions: In severe aortic stenosis, bicuspid valves have proportionately more fibrosis than tricuspid valves, especially in women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjci/jead142

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial investigations using CTA-based approach have identified varied patterns of AV fibro-calcific remodeling attributed to age, sex, valve morphology, and hemodynamic phenotype.

    “Initial investigations using this CTA-based approach have identified varied patterns of AV fibro-calcific remodeling, attributed to a complex interplay of factors including age, sex, valve morphology (tricuspid vs bicuspid), and hemodynamic phenotype (high versus low gradient-AS)13–15.”

    From Characterization of Aortic Valve Stenosis by CT Angiography in a Diverse US Cohort (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion reports CTA-derived differences in fibro-calcific valve composition by bicuspid versus tricuspid morphology and by sex. The study matched patients by age and does not report composition patterns by age or high- versus low-gradient aortic stenosis, so those parts of the attributed claim are not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ability to quantify AV leaflet fibrosis using dedicated valve segmentation software is feasible and provides important information beyond AV calcium score, especially in women, bicuspid AV, and LG-AS.

    “The ability to quantify AV leaflet fibrosis using dedicated valve segmentation software, which cannot be done with non-contrast CT, has recently been shown feasible and provides important information beyond AV calcium score, especially in women, bicuspid AV, and LG-AS11,14,15,18.”

    From Characterization of Aortic Valve Stenosis by CT Angiography in a Diverse US Cohort (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The CT angiography image analysis section (page unavailable) describes software-based quantification of valve fibrosis, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports findings particularly relevant to women and bicuspid valves. The paper does not establish added diagnostic value over calcium scoring for bicuspid valves—it says that requires further study—and the available passages do not report a finding specific to low-gradient aortic stenosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the semiautomated AV tissue quantification has been demonstrated previously.

    “The detailed process has been described previously, and the intra and interobserver reproducibility has been demonstrated14,15,18.”

    From Characterization of Aortic Valve Stenosis by CT Angiography in a Diverse US Cohort (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results (page unavailable) demonstrate excellent interobserver repeatability for semiautomated valve tissue measurements, and CT angiography image analysis says a previous study demonstrated excellent reproducibility. Our copy does not specify or report intraobserver reproducibility, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, K. P., Lin, A., Kumar, N., Esposito, G., Grodecki, K., Lloyd, G., Mathur, A., Baumbach, A., Mullen, M. J., Williams, M. C., Newby, D. E., Treibel, T. A., Dweck, M. R., & Dey, D.
Affiliations
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Dey, Damini
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2023-06-20
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1653-1660
ISSN
  • 2047-2404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2412
OpenAlex
W4381328801
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (CH/09/002/26360, FS/ICRF/20/26002, FS/14/78/31020, FS/19/35/34374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
severe aortic stenosis, bicuspid aortic valve, tricuspid aortic valve, valve fibrosis, valve calcification, sex differences, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, contrast-enhanced CT angiography, aortic jet velocity, aortic annulus
MeSH terms
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, Aged, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Female, Fibrosis, Humans, Male, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review