Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,058

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Open access
Plana, J. C., Galderisi, M., Barac, A., Ewer, M. S., Ky, B., Scherrer-Crosbie, M., Ganame, J., Sebag, I. A., Agler, D. A., Badano, L. P., Banchs, J., Cardinale, D., Carver, J., Cerqueira, M., DeCara, J. M., Edvardsen, T., Flamm, S. D., Force, T., Griffin, B. P., Jerusalem, G., Liu, J. E., Magalhaes, A., Marwick, T., Sanchez, L. Y., Sicari, R., Villarraga, H. R., Lancellotti, P.·2014·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Cardiac dysfunction resulting from exposure to cancer therapeutics was first recognized in the 1960s, with the widespread introduction of anthracyclines into the oncologic therapeutic armamentarium. Heart failure (HF) associated with anthracyclines was then recognized as an important side effect. As a result, physicians learned to limit their doses to avoid cardiac dysfunction. Several strategies have been used over the past decades to detect it. Two of them evolved over time to be very useful: endomyocardial biopsies and monitoring of left ven- tricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) by cardiac imaging. Examination of endomyocardial biopsies proved to be the most sensitive and spe- cific parameter for the identification of anthracycline-induced LV dysfunction and became the gold standard in the 1970s. However, the interest in endomyocardial biopsy has diminished over time because of the reduction in the cumulative dosages used to treat ma- lignancies, the invasive nature of the procedure, and the remarkable progress made in noninvasive cardiac imaging. The noninvasive evaluation of LVEF has gained importance, and notwithstanding the limitations of the techniques used for its calculation, has emerged as the most widely used strategy for monitoring the changes in cardiac function, both during and after the administration of potentially car- diotoxic cancer treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjci/jeu192

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,058

Metadata

Authors
Plana, J. C., Galderisi, M., Barac, A., Ewer, M. S., Ky, B., Scherrer-Crosbie, M., Ganame, J., Sebag, I. A., Agler, D. A., Badano, L. P., Banchs, J., Cardinale, D., Carver, J., Cerqueira, M., DeCara, J. M., Edvardsen, T., Flamm, S. D., Force, T., Griffin, B. P., Jerusalem, G., Liu, J. E., Magalhaes, A., Marwick, T., Sanchez, L. Y., Sicari, R., Villarraga, H. R., & Lancellotti, P.
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2014-09-19
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1063-1093
ISSN
  • 2047-2404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2412
OpenAlex
W2068483637
Cited by
1,058
References
4
FWCI
41.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ehjci/jeu192
The paper
Plana, J. C., Galderisi, M., Barac, A., Ewer, M. S., Ky, B., Scherrer-Crosbie, M., Ganame, J., Sebag, I. A., Agler, D. A., Badano, L. P., Banchs, J., Cardinale, D., Carver, J., Cerqueira, M., DeCara, J. M., Edvardsen, T., Flamm, S. D., Force, T., Griffin, B. P., . . . Lancellotti, P. (2014). Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.