Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EACVI/EHRA Expert Consensus Document on the role of multi-modality imaging for the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation

Open access
Donal, Erwan, Lip, Gregory Y H, Galderisi, Maurizio, Goette, Andreas, Shah, Dipen, Marwan, Mohamed, Lederlin, Mathieu, Mondillo, Sergio, Edvardsen, Thor, Sitges, Marta, Grapsa, Julia, Garbi, Madalina, Senior, Roxy, Gimelli, Alessia, Potpara, Tatjana S, Van Gelder, Isabelle C, Gorenek, Bulent, Mabo, Philippe, Lancellotti, Patrizio, Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Popescu, Bogdan A, Hindricks, Gerhard, Habib, Gilbert, Cosyns, Bernard, Delgado, Victoria, Haugaa, Kristina H., Muraru, Denisa, Nieman, Koen, Cohen, Ariel·2016·European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac rhythm disorder. Evaluation of patients with AF requires an electrocardiogram, but imaging techniques should be considered for defining management and driving treatment. The present document is an expert consensus from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association. The clinical value of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), computed tomography (CT), and nuclear imaging in AF patients are challenged. Left atrial (LA) volume and strain in echocardiography as well as assessment of LA fibrosis in CMR are discussed. The value of CT, especially in planning interventions, is highlighted. Fourteen consensus statements have been reached. These may serve as a guide for both imagers and electrophysiologists for best selecting the imaging technique and for best interpreting its results in AF patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjci/jev354

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Donal, E., Lip, G. Y. H., Galderisi, M., Goette, A., Shah, D., Marwan, M., Lederlin, M., Mondillo, S., Edvardsen, T., Sitges, M., Grapsa, J., Garbi, M., Senior, R., Gimelli, A., Potpara, T. S., Van Gelder, I. C., Gorenek, B., Mabo, P., Lancellotti, P., Kuck, K.-H., Popescu, B. A., Hindricks, G., Habib, G., Cosyns, B., Delgado, V., Haugaa, K. H., Muraru, D., Nieman, K., & Cohen, A.
Venue
European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
355-383
ISSN
  • 2047-2404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2412
OpenAlex
W2263916923
Cited by
341
References
8
FWCI
27.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EACVI/EHRA Expert Consensus Document on the role of multi-modality imaging for the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ehjci/jev354
The paper
Donal, E., Lip, G. Y. H., Galderisi, M., Goette, A., Shah, D., Marwan, M., Lederlin, M., Mondillo, S., Edvardsen, T., Sitges, M., Grapsa, J., Garbi, M., Senior, R., Gimelli, A., Potpara, T. S., Van Gelder, I. C., Gorenek, B., Mabo, P., Lancellotti, P., . . . Cohen, A. (2016). EACVI/EHRA Expert Consensus Document on the role of multi-modality imaging for the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.