Cited by 51Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury Research

FLOW trial stopped early due to evidence of renal protection with semaglutide

Open access
Gragnano, Felice, De Sio, Vincenzo, Calabrò, Paolo·2024·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

On 10 October 2023, Novo Nordisk1 announced the decision to stop the kidney outcome trial FLOW (Effect of semaglutide versus placebo on the progression of renal impairment in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease; NCT03819153). The decision to terminate the trial prematurely was based on the recommendation of the independent Data Monitoring Committee, which concluded that the results of a pre-specified interim analysis met the criteria to stop the trial early for efficacy. Full results from the FLOW trial are expected to be released in the first half of 2024. This announcement by the Danish company comes on the eve of the presentation of the SELECT2 cardiovascular outcome trial at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2023, in which subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly was associated with a significant 20% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) compared with placebo in 17 604 patients aged ≥45 years with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease without a history of diabetes.2 Recent evidence suggests a potential protective effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).3–6 However, most of this evidence has been derived indirectly from cardiovascular outcome trials that included patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), with renal adverse events reported only as secondary exploratory outcomes.3–6 Dedicated renal outcomes trials, such as FLOW, are needed to confirm the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RAs.7 FLOW is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven, phase 3b superiority trial comparing subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. a visually identical placebo as an adjunct to standard of care on renal outcomes in patients with T2DM and CKD (Figure 1).7 An 8-week dose-escalation regimen was used to initiate treatment, with dose escalation (if tolerated) from 0.25 mg/week for 4 weeks to 0.5 mg for 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1.0 mg/week for the remainder of the trial.7 A total of 3534 patients were enrolled at 418 study sites across 28 countries. The eligibility criteria were chosen to select a broad population of patients at high risk of CKD progression.7 Design and main characteristics of the FLOW trial. CV: cardiovascular; KDIGO: kidney disease: improving global outcomes; UACR: urine albumin creatinine ratio; HbA1c: glycosylated haemoglobin; BMI: body-mass-index; SGLT2-I: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; OW: once weekly; CKRT: chronic kidney replacement therapy; s.c.: subcutaneous. Other abbreviations as in the text. The primary objective of the FLOW trial was to demonstrate a delay in the progression of CKD and a reduction in the risk of renal and cardiovascular mortality using a composite primary endpoint consisting of (i) onset of kidney failure, defined as the initiation of chronic kidney replacement therapy (i.e. dialysis or renal transplantation) or persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for at least 4 weeks; (ii) death from kidney failure; (iii) cardiovascular death; and (iv) onset of a persistent ≥50% reduction in eGFR from baseline. Key secondary endpoints included the annual rate of change in eGFR, MACEs (a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), and all-cause death.7 In conclusion, the FLOW trial has the potential to expand the pharmacotherapy options for patients with T2DM and CKD to prevent clinically relevant renal outcomes with semaglutide. The study results are potentially practice-changing and are eagerly awaited by the cardiology community. Conflict of interest: Relationships with Industry and Other Entities: Drs. Gragnano, De Sio, and Calabrò have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. There are no new data associated with this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad080

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FLOW trial warranted early termination due to evidence that weekly 1 mg semaglutide reduced the risk of kidney-disease progression as well as cardiovascular and kidney death by 24% compared with placebo.

    “The FLOW trial (NCT03819153) warranted early termination due to evidence that the use of weekly 1 mg semaglutide reduced the risk of kidney-disease progression as well as cardiovascular and kidney death by 24% compared with placebo.65”

    From GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

    The opening PHARMAPULSE section says FLOW was stopped early after an interim analysis met the criteria for efficacy. The “Why test semaglutide for renal outcomes?” section identifies once-weekly 1 mg semaglutide versus placebo and the kidney and cardiovascular outcomes, but gives no 24% risk reduction; it says the full results were still expected. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gragnano, F., De Sio, V., & Calabrò, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” , Abramo Lincoln 5 - 81100 Caserta , Italy
Corresponding author
Gragnano, Felice
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Published
2023-11-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
7-9
ISSN
  • 2055-6837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-6845
OpenAlex
W4388452162
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 1
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
semaglutide, FLOW trial, early trial termination, renal protection, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, data monitoring committees, renal function, cardiovascular outcome trials, major adverse cardiovascular events, obesity, dose escalation, cardiovascular safety, Novo Nordisk
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Clinical Trials as Topic, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Humans, Kidney

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review