FLOW trial stopped early due to evidence of renal protection with semaglutide
Open accessAbstract
On 10 October 2023, Novo Nordisk1 announced the decision to stop the kidney outcome trial FLOW (Effect of semaglutide versus placebo on the progression of renal impairment in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease; NCT03819153). The decision to terminate the trial prematurely was based on the recommendation of the independent Data Monitoring Committee, which concluded that the results of a pre-specified interim analysis met the criteria to stop the trial early for efficacy. Full results from the FLOW trial are expected to be released in the first half of 2024. This announcement by the Danish company comes on the eve of the presentation of the SELECT2 cardiovascular outcome trial at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2023, in which subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly was associated with a significant 20% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) compared with placebo in 17 604 patients aged ≥45 years with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease without a history of diabetes.2 Recent evidence suggests a potential protective effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).3–6 However, most of this evidence has been derived indirectly from cardiovascular outcome trials that included patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), with renal adverse events reported only as secondary exploratory outcomes.3–6 Dedicated renal outcomes trials, such as FLOW, are needed to confirm the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RAs.7 FLOW is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven, phase 3b superiority trial comparing subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. a visually identical placebo as an adjunct to standard of care on renal outcomes in patients with T2DM and CKD (Figure 1).7 An 8-week dose-escalation regimen was used to initiate treatment, with dose escalation (if tolerated) from 0.25 mg/week for 4 weeks to 0.5 mg for 4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1.0 mg/week for the remainder of the trial.7 A total of 3534 patients were enrolled at 418 study sites across 28 countries. The eligibility criteria were chosen to select a broad population of patients at high risk of CKD progression.7 Design and main characteristics of the FLOW trial. CV: cardiovascular; KDIGO: kidney disease: improving global outcomes; UACR: urine albumin creatinine ratio; HbA1c: glycosylated haemoglobin; BMI: body-mass-index; SGLT2-I: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; OW: once weekly; CKRT: chronic kidney replacement therapy; s.c.: subcutaneous. Other abbreviations as in the text. The primary objective of the FLOW trial was to demonstrate a delay in the progression of CKD and a reduction in the risk of renal and cardiovascular mortality using a composite primary endpoint consisting of (i) onset of kidney failure, defined as the initiation of chronic kidney replacement therapy (i.e. dialysis or renal transplantation) or persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for at least 4 weeks; (ii) death from kidney failure; (iii) cardiovascular death; and (iv) onset of a persistent ≥50% reduction in eGFR from baseline. Key secondary endpoints included the annual rate of change in eGFR, MACEs (a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), and all-cause death.7 In conclusion, the FLOW trial has the potential to expand the pharmacotherapy options for patients with T2DM and CKD to prevent clinically relevant renal outcomes with semaglutide. The study results are potentially practice-changing and are eagerly awaited by the cardiology community. Conflict of interest: Relationships with Industry and Other Entities: Drs. Gragnano, De Sio, and Calabrò have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. There are no new data associated with this article.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The FLOW trial warranted early termination due to evidence that weekly 1 mg semaglutide reduced the risk of kidney-disease progression as well as cardiovascular and kidney death by 24% compared with placebo.
“The FLOW trial (NCT03819153) warranted early termination due to evidence that the use of weekly 1 mg semaglutide reduced the risk of kidney-disease progression as well as cardiovascular and kidney death by 24% compared with placebo.65”
From GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
The opening PHARMAPULSE section says FLOW was stopped early after an interim analysis met the criteria for efficacy. The “Why test semaglutide for renal outcomes?” section identifies once-weekly 1 mg semaglutide versus placebo and the kidney and cardiovascular outcomes, but gives no 24% risk reduction; it says the full results were still expected. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sattar, N., Lee, M. M. Y., Kristensen, S. L., Branch, K. R. H., Del Prato, S., Khurmi, N. S., Lam, C. S. P., Lopes, R. D., McMurray, J. J. V., Pratley, R. E., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00203-5 · Cited by 1,599 · see citing works
Rossing, P., Baeres, F. M. M., Bakris, G., Bosch-Traberg, H., Gislum, M., Gough, S. C. L., Idorn, T., Lawson, J., Mahaffey, K. W., Mann, J. F. E., et al. (2023) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad009 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
New pharmacological agents and novel cardiovascular pharmacotherapy strategies in 2022
Tamargo, J. L., Agewall, S., Borghi, C., Ceconi, C., Cerbai, E., Dan, G. A., Ferdinandy, P., Grove, E. L., Rocca, B., Sulzgruber, P., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad034 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Kato, E. T., Lewis, B. S., & Ono, K. (2023) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad072 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
What's new in pharmacotherapy at ESC Congress 2023?
Gragnano, F., Calabrò, P., & Galli, M. (2023) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad064 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alfaris, N., Waldrop, S., Johnson, V., Boaventura, B., Kendrick, K., & Stanford, F. C. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102782 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Jakubowska, A., Roux, C. W. L., & Viljoen, A. (2024) · Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.3803/enm.2024.1942 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Zafer, M., Tavaglione, F., Romero‐Gómez, M., & Loomba, R. (2025) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.70196 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Gogineni, P., Melson, E., Papamargaritis, D., & Davies, M. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2024.2356254 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Srivastava, G., Campbell, S. L., Hill, C. R., Stanley, T. L., Lawson, E. A., Apovian, C. M., Almandoz, J. P., Leggio, L., Lakdawalla, D. N., Dar, M., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.06.015 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gragnano, F., De Sio, V., & Calabrò, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” , Abramo Lincoln 5 - 81100 Caserta , Italy
- Corresponding author
- Gragnano, Felice
- Venue
- European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-11-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-9
- ISSN
- 2055-6837 (ISSN-L)
- 2055-6845
- OpenAlex
- W4388452162
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- semaglutide, FLOW trial, early trial termination, renal protection, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, data monitoring committees, renal function, cardiovascular outcome trials, major adverse cardiovascular events, obesity, dose escalation, cardiovascular safety, Novo Nordisk
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Clinical Trials as Topic, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Humans, Kidney
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review