Cited by 11African history and culture studiesChristian Theology and MissionFemale Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya's female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930

Open access
Anderson, David M·2018·The English Historical Review

Abstract

Abstract For the people of Kenya, recent global debates on the emotional and medical harm caused by female genital mutilation (FGM), allied to arguments about the human rights of the women subjected to such acts, have a significant historical resonance. In the 1920s, Christian missionaries in central Kenya mounted a concerted campaign to prohibit ‘female circumcision’ among their flourishing African congregations. This provoked a backlash, with thousands of Kikuyu Christians deserting the missions to found their own independent churches and schools in the early 1930s. These events, commonly referred to as the ‘female circumcision controversy’, mark a turning point in Kenya’s colonial history. Taking as its starting-point the murder in 1930 of a female missionary with the African Inland Mission, the article explores the actions and attitudes of white women missionaries, revealing a subtle and complex picture of missionary views of African society and the process of Christian conversion, arguing that, as the circumcision crisis developed during 1929, these women stood at the centre of the gathering storm, their experience emblematic of the emotional, cultural and political challenges in the circumcision debate. This account adds an important new dimension to our understanding of gender in Kenya’s circumcision debate, but it also reveals why colonial silence has surrounded the event at the very centre of the crisis: the murder of Hulda Stumpf.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehr/cey325

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 136 J. Spencer, The Kenya African Union (London, 1985), pp.70-77. 137 Rosberg and Nottingham, Myth of Mau Mau, p. 124. 138 See the correspondence between Nairobi and London, from January to March 1930, in TNA, CO 533/394/10 139 For additional indications of this, see R.D. Waller, 'They Do the Dictating and We Must Submit: The AIM in Maasailand', in T. Spear and I.N. Kimambo, eds., East African Expressions of Christianity (Oxford, 1999), pp. 83-126. 140 Frederiksen, 'Jomo Kenyatta', p. 35. 141 Kanogo, African Womanhood, p. 89.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Anderson, David M
Venue
The English Historical Review
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
133
Issue
565
Pages
1512-1545
ISSN
  • 0013-8266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4534
OpenAlex
W2901028439
Cited by
11
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The English Historical Review (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Christian Theology and Mission
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Keywords
female genital mutilation, women missionaries, Christian missions, gender and colonialism, Christian conversion, 1920s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya's female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ehr/cey325
The paper
Anderson, D. M. (2018). Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya's female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930. The English Historical Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cey325