Cited by 167Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Open access
Tsai, Yi-Chin, Phan, Kevin, Munkholm-Larsen, Stine, Tian, David H., La Meir, Mark, Yan, Tristan D.·2015·European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) during surgical ablation has emerged as a potential treatment strategy to reduce stroke and perioperative mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The present meta-analysis aims to assess current evidence on the efficacy and safety between LAAO and LAA preservation cohorts for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed using six electronic databases from their inception to November 2013, identifying all relevant comparative randomized and observational studies comparing LAAO with non-LAAO in AF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Data were extracted and analysed according to predefined endpoints including mortality, stroke, postoperative AF and reoperation for bleeding. RESULTS: Seven relevant studies identified for qualitative and quantitative analyses, including 3653 patients undergoing LAAO (n = 1716) versus non-LAAO (n = 1937). Stroke incidence was significantly reduced in the LAAO occlusion group at the 30-day follow-up [0.95 vs 1.9%; odds ratio (OR) 0.46; P = 0.005] and the latest follow-up (1.4 vs 4.1%; OR 0.48; P = 0.01), compared with the non-LAAO group. Incidence of all-cause mortality was significantly decreased with LAAO (1.9 vs 5%; OR 0.38; P = 0.0003), while postoperative AF and reoperation for bleeding was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: While acknowledging the limitations and inadequate statistical power of the available evidence, this study suggests LAAO as a promising strategy for stroke reduction perioperatively and at the short-term follow-up without a significant increase in complications. Larger randomized studies in the future are required, with clearer surgical and anticoagulation protocols and adequate long-term follow-up, to validate the clinical efficacy of LAAO versus non-LAAO groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejcts/ezu291

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, Y.-C., Phan, K., Munkholm-Larsen, S., Tian, D. H., La Meir, M., & Yan, T. D.
Affiliations
  • Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Collaborative Research Group (AU)
Corresponding author
Yan, Tristan D.
Venue
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Published
2014-07-26
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
847-854
ISSN
  • 1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-734X
OpenAlex
W2099588187
Cited by
167
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
left atrial appendage closure, atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, stroke prevention, perioperative mortality, postoperative atrial fibrillation, reoperation for bleeding, anticoagulation
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Catheter Ablation, Atrial Appendage, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review