Cited by 61Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCleft Lip and Palate Research

Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy

Open access
Cozza, P.·2004·The European Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate cephalometrically the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue modifications induced by activator treatment in patients with Class II malocclusions caused by mandibular retrognathism. The subjects, all in the mixed dentition, were selected from a single centre and were divided into two groups: 40 patients treated with an incisor double capping activator (20 girls, 20 boys with a mean age of 10 years) and a control group of 30 subjects (15 girls, 15 boys with a mean age of 10 years). The dentoskeletal and aesthetic changes that occurred were compared on lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T0) and after 18-24 months, when the activator was removed (T1). In the control group the radiographs were obtained before (T0) and after (T1) 21 months (standard deviation +/- 3 months). Activator treatment in these growing patients resulted in a correction of the Class II relationship (ANB -2.14 degrees), a restriction of maxillary growth (SNA -0.5 degrees), an advancement of the mandibular structures (SNB +1.64 degrees, FH--NPg +3.39 degrees; OLp-B +5.17 mm, OLp-Pg +5.14 mm, OLp-Go +2.44 mm), a correction of the overjet (-5.03 mm), an improvement in overbite (-1.17 mm) and uprighting of the maxillary incisors (1--FH -5.64 degrees). The activator appliance was effective in treating growing patients with mandibular deficiency: activator therapy corrected Class II malocclusions by a combination of skeletal and dental changes and improved the soft tissue facial profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejo/26.3.293

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cozza, P.
Affiliations
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Cozza, P.
Venue
The European Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
293-302
ISSN
  • 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2210
OpenAlex
W1975388436
Cited by
61
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Journal of Orthodontics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
activator appliance, Class II malocclusion, mandibular retrognathism, mandibular deficiency, dentoskeletal changes, facial profile, maxillary growth restriction, mandibular advancement, overjet, overbite, mixed dentition, growing patients
MeSH terms
Activator Appliances, Cephalometry, Child, Esthetics, Dental, Face, Facial Bones, Female, Humans, Male, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Maxillofacial Development, Orthodontics, Corrective, Retrospective Studies, Vertical Dimension, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Mandibular Advancement, Retrognathia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review