The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review
Abstract
This systematic review examined the published scientific research on the psychosocial impact of cleft lip and palate (CLP) among children and adults. The primary objective of the review was to determine whether having CLP places an individual at greater risk of psychosocial problems. Studies that examined the psychosocial functioning of children and adults with repaired non-syndromal CLP were suitable for inclusion. The following sources were searched: Medline (January 1966-December 2003), CINAHL (January 1982-December 2003), Web of Science (January 1981-December 2003), PsycINFO (January 1887-December 2003), the reference section of relevant articles, and hand searches of relevant journals. There were 652 abstracts initially identified through database and other searches. On closer examination of these, only 117 appeared to meet the inclusion criteria. The full text of these papers was examined, with only 64 articles finally identified as suitable for inclusion in the review. Thirty of the 64 studies included a control group. The studies were longitudinal, cross-sectional, or retrospective in nature.Overall, the majority of children and adults with CLP do not appear to experience major psychosocial problems, although some specific problems may arise. For example, difficulties have been reported in relation to behavioural problems, satisfaction with facial appearance, depression, and anxiety. A few differences between cleft types have been found in relation to self-concept, satisfaction with facial appearance, depression, attachment, learning problems, and interpersonal relationships. With a few exceptions, the age of the individual with CLP does not appear to influence the occurrence or severity of psychosocial problems. However, the studies lack the uniformity and consistency required to adequately summarize the psychosocial problems resulting from CLP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wehby, G., & Cassell, C. (2010) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x · Cited by 441
Psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/or palate: A narrative review of the literature
Stock, N. M., & Feragen, K. B. (2016) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1143944 · Cited by 140
Pre and post-operative psychological functioning in younger and older children with microtia
Johns, A. L., Lucash, R. E., Im, D. D., & Lewin, S. L. (2015) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.019 · Cited by 99
Vásquez-Cárdenas, J., Zapata-Noreña, Ó., Carvajal-Flórez, Á., Barbosa-Liz, D. M., Giannakopoulos, N. N., & Faggion, C. M. (2019) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.009 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunt, O., Burden, D., Hepper, P., & Johnston, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Orthodontics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-285
- ISSN
- 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2210
- OpenAlex
- W2136672770
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ejo/cji004
- The paper
- Hunt, O., Burden, D., Hepper, P., & Johnston, C. (2005). The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.